A digital forensics analyst receives a seized external hard drive transported from a field office via a secure courier. Upon intake, the analyst notices that the tamper-evident transport bag was torn and the accompanying paper tracking form lacks the courier's transfer signature. Before connecting the drive to a hardware write-blocker for imaging, which of the following actions MUST the analyst perform first to maintain evidentiary standards?
- Document the seal discrepancy and missing signature on the chain of custody log, notify the lead investigator, and recalculate the intake verification hash.Answer
- BOverwrite the initial field intake hash record with a newly computed hash value to ensure the original evidence log matches the received hardware state.
- CGenerate a asymmetric public key digital signature for the physical drive to establish non-repudiation of the transport courier's identity.
- DConnect the physical drive directly to an online workstation without a write-blocker to inspect the file system metadata and confirm file modified dates.
Answer
Document the seal discrepancy and missing signature on the chain of custody log, notify the lead investigator, and recalculate the intake verification hash.
Chain of custody protocol dictates that any physical damage, missing signatures, or transfer anomalies must be explicitly recorded in the evidence tracking log. Logging the discrepancy immediately alongside re-verifying hash values ensures full transparency and legal defensibility when presenting evidence in court.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Chain of Custody Documentation and Evidence Intake Integrity Verification
Estimated Time:2m 0s