The table below presents operational metrics for seven regional grain storage elevators.
| Elevator ID | Region | Storage Capacity (thousand metric tons) | Annual Throughput Rate (%) | Average Loading Time (hours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha | Midwest | 520 | 82% | 3.2 |
| Beta | Plains | 520 | 78% | 4.1 |
| Gamma | Midwest | 600 | 85% | 2.8 |
| Delta | Delta | 450 | 91% | 3.5 |
| Epsilon | Plains | 450 | 88% | 2.9 |
| Zeta | Midwest | 600 | 74% | 3.1 |
| Eta | Delta | 380 | 95% | 2.4 |
If the table is sorted in descending order by Storage Capacity (thousand metric tons), and ties are broken by sorting in ascending order by Average Loading Time (hours), which elevator occupies the 4th position from the top?
- AAlpha
- BetaAnswer
- CDelta
- DGamma
- EZeta
Answer
Elevator Beta occupies the 4th position from the top after primary sorting descending by Storage Capacity and secondary sorting ascending by Average Loading Time.
Sorting the table primarily by Storage Capacity in descending order places the two elevators with 600 thousand metric tons (Gamma and Zeta) at the top, occupying positions 1 and 2. The next highest capacity tier is 520 thousand metric tons, shared by Alpha and Beta. Applying the secondary sort rule (Average Loading Time in ascending order), Alpha has a shorter loading time () than Beta (). Thus, Alpha takes the 3rd position and Beta takes the 4th position.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Multi-Column Table Sorting and Secondary Tie-Breaking Logic
Alternative Method
Filter out the lower capacity groups (450 and 380 thousand metric tons) immediately since the top 4 spots must belong to the highest capacity groups (600 and 520). Compare only Alpha and Beta for the 4th spot by looking at their loading times.
Estimated Time:1m 30s