Question

Difficulty: EasyLogical Arguments and Causal Relationships

A municipal study observed that cities with a higher number of public parks also report higher average levels of physical activity among their residents. Based on this observation, a researcher concluded that constructing public parks directly causes residents to become more physically active. Match each statement below with the logical role it plays in evaluating the researcher's causal claim.

  • A study demonstrating that residents significantly increase their weekly exercise routines after a new park opens in their neighborhood.Strengthens the argument by providing evidence consistent with direct causality.
  • A survey indicating that individuals who are already highly active actively choose to relocate to cities with numerous existing parks.Weakens the argument by suggesting reverse causality (effect driving cause).
  • Data showing that wealthier cities independently fund both extensive park construction and public fitness initiatives.Weakens the argument by introducing a confounding variable (common underlying cause).

Answer

Statement 1 strengthens the direct causal claim; Statement 2 demonstrates reverse causality; Statement 3 identifies a confounding common cause.
The correct matches accurately distinguish between evidence supporting direct causation, evidence illustrating reverse causation, and evidence establishing a third-variable confounder.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the researcher's conclusion
The researcher posits a direct causal link: Park construction (Cause) \rightarrow Resident activity (Effect).
Identifying the proposed direction of cause and effect is essential to evaluating logical roles.
2
Evaluate the first statement
The first statement establishes a chronological sequence where the park opening precedes the increase in activity, supporting direct causality.
Evidence showing that the cause precedes the effect strengthens a causal argument.
3
Evaluate the second statement
The second statement shows that active people move to cities with parks, implying activity level (Effect) drives the residency pattern near parks (Cause).
Reversing cause and effect undermines the researcher's claim of direct causality.
4
Evaluate the third statement
The third statement introduces municipal wealth as an alternate factor influencing both park availability and exercise programs.
A third factor causing both observed variables explains the correlation without direct causality.

Key Concept

Causal Reasoning and Logical Roles in Correlation Analysis
Rate this question