Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying Unstated Assumptions

To combat fraudulent crop loss claims, a national agricultural insurer plans to require all policyholders to submit high-resolution satellite imagery of their farmland taken immediately before and after any reported severe weather event. The insurer reasons that comparing these images will enable claims adjusters to verify whether physical crop damage actually occurred as a direct result of the weather event, thereby eliminating payouts for pre-existing crop degradation or unverified losses.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the insurer's plan depends?

  1. A
    The total financial cost of fraudulent crop loss claims exceeds the overall cost of legitimate claims processed annually by the insurer.
  2. B
    Satellite imagery analysis is less expensive to execute than sending human adjusters to conduct traditional on-site physical inspections.
  3. High-resolution satellite imagery can provide enough detail to distinguish pre-existing crop degradation from physical damage caused by a severe weather event.Answer
  4. D
    Severe weather events decrease the likelihood that policyholders will attempt to submit unverified claims for crop degradation.
  5. E
    Agricultural insurance companies in neighboring regions have successfully reduced fraudulent payouts by implementing mandatory satellite monitoring.

Answer

The insurer's plan relies on the assumption that high-resolution satellite imagery can provide enough detail to distinguish pre-existing crop degradation from physical damage caused by a severe weather event.
The conclusion asserts that comparing satellite images will eliminate payouts for pre-existing crop degradation by verifying whether damage resulted directly from a weather event. For this verification process to work, the satellite images must possess sufficient resolution and detail to differentiate between crop degradation present before the storm and new damage caused by the storm. If the images cannot distinguish between these two states, adjusters cannot verify causality, and the plan fails. Therefore, this statement is a necessary unstated assumption.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument into premises and main conclusion.
Premise: Insurers will require satellite imagery immediately before and after severe weather. Premise: Adjusters will compare images to verify if damage was directly caused by the storm. Conclusion: The plan will eliminate payouts for pre-existing degradation or unverified losses.
Identifying the logic gap requires clearly isolating what the premises establish versus what the conclusion claims.
2
Identify the unstated logical gap between the premise and conclusion.
The premises state that images will be compared, but assume that comparing these images actually enables adjusters to tell pre-existing damage apart from new weather damage.
An assumption is an unstated premise required to bridge the gap between the evidence provided and the outcome claimed.
3
Apply the Negation Test to confirm logical necessity.
Negated statement: 'High-resolution satellite imagery CANNOT provide enough detail to distinguish pre-existing degradation from weather damage.' If true, comparing images fails to verify causality, shattering the conclusion that fraudulent payouts will be eliminated.
If the negated version of a choice causes the argument to collapse, that choice is a strictly necessary assumption.

Key Concept

Identifying Unstated Assumptions using the Negation Test
Estimated Time:1m 50s
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Unstated Assumptions

More questions from this topic