Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardIdentifying Intermediate and Subsidiary Conclusions

Agricultural technology firms have recently advocated for nationwide tax credits to promote biochar application in commercial farming, contending that soil carbon storage is essential for meeting climate targets. However, verifying long-term carbon sequestration in varied soil microbiomes remains technically imprecise and prone to significant measurement error. Consequently, issuing standardized credits based on current measurement protocols will inevitably lead to overcrediting unverified carbon sinks. Therefore, the government should defer the implementation of biochar-based carbon tax credits until higher-precision auditing technologies are commercially deployed.

Based on the passage above, match each numbered claim on the left to its exact structural role in the argument on the right.

  • Soil carbon storage is essential for meeting climate targets.Contextual background claim representing the rationale of proponents, acknowledged by the author.
  • Verifying long-term carbon sequestration in varied soil microbiomes remains technically imprecise and prone to significant measurement error.Supporting premise providing factual evidence regarding current technical limitations.
  • Issuing standardized credits based on current measurement protocols will inevitably lead to overcrediting unverified carbon sinks.Intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion that is supported by an empirical premise and acts as the direct premise for the final recommendation.
  • The government should defer the implementation of biochar-based carbon tax credits until higher-precision auditing technologies are commercially deployed.Main conclusion expressing the author's ultimate policy recommendation.

Answer

The statement regarding the inevitable overcrediting of unverified carbon sinks functions as the intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion. It is inferred from the premise concerning measurement imprecision and directly supports the main policy recommendation to defer tax credits.
The argument builds a multi-tiered logical structure. The statement describing technical measurement errors serves as an un-derived factual premise. From this premise, the author infers that issuing credits based on current protocols will lead to overcrediting (the intermediate conclusion). That intermediate conclusion then serves as the direct logical support for the main conclusion, which recommends deferring the tax credits until better technology exists.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the passage
The final sentence ('Therefore, the government should defer...') is the author's ultimate normative recommendation and primary claim.
It is signaled by the conclusion indicator 'Therefore' and expresses the final policy stance that the entire argument seeks to prove.
2
Locate raw empirical premises that do not depend on prior claims
The statement that verification in soil microbiomes 'remains technically imprecise' acts as an underlying factual premise.
This claim is presented as a foundational factual observation without any supporting sub-arguments within the text.
3
Analyze the claim linking the factual premise to the main conclusion
The assertion that standardized credits 'will inevitably lead to overcrediting' is derived from technical imprecision ('Consequently') and provides the rationale for deferring policy.
Because it acts both as a conclusion relative to the measurement error premise and as a premise supporting the final deferral recommendation, it is the intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion.
4
Categorize remaining contextual claims
The claim that soil carbon storage is essential for climate targets represents background context detailing the ag-tech firms' stance.
It provides the backdrop against which the author presents a caveat and counter-proposal.

Key Concept

Identifying Intermediate and Subsidiary Conclusions
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Intermediate and Subsidiary Conclusions

More questions from this topic