Question

Difficulty: HardInequalities and Absolute Value Equations

How many integer values of nn satisfy the inequality ∣n2−9∣≤2n+6|n^2 - 9| \leq 2n + 6?

Answer: 6

Answer

There are 6 integer values of nn that satisfy the given inequality.
Because ∣n2−9∣≥0|n^2 - 9| \geq 0 for all real numbers, 2n+62n + 6 must be non-negative, requiring n≥−3n \geq -3. At n=−3n = -3, the inequality reduces to 0≤00 \leq 0, which is valid. For n>−3n > -3, the term n+3n + 3 is positive, so factoring ∣n2−9∣|n^2 - 9| into ∣n−3∣(n+3)|n - 3|(n + 3) and dividing by n+3n + 3 simplifies the inequality to ∣n−3∣≤2|n - 3| \leq 2. This yields the integer range 1≤n≤51 \leq n \leq 5, containing 5 integers. Including n=−3n = -3 gives a total of 6 integer solutions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the domain constraint from the non-negativity of the absolute value expression.
2n+6≥0  ⟹  n≥−32n + 6 \geq 0 \implies n \geq -3
The absolute value expression ∣n2−9∣|n^2 - 9| is non-negative for all real nn, so the right-hand side must also be non-negative.
2
Evaluate the boundary case n=−3n = -3.
∣(−3)2−9∣=0|(-3)^2 - 9| = 0 and 2(−3)+6=0  ⟹  0≤02(-3) + 6 = 0 \implies 0 \leq 0 (True)
When n=−3n = -3, both sides equal 0, making n=−3n = -3 a valid integer solution.
3
Factor the quadratic inside the absolute value for n>−3n > -3 and simplify.
∣n−3∣∣n+3∣≤2(n+3)  ⟹  ∣n−3∣≤2|n - 3||n + 3| \leq 2(n + 3) \implies |n - 3| \leq 2
Since n>−3n > -3, the term n+3n + 3 is strictly positive, allowing division of both sides by n+3n + 3 without reversing the inequality.
4
Solve the linear absolute value inequality ∣n−3∣≤2|n - 3| \leq 2.
−2≤n−3≤2  ⟹  1≤n≤5-2 \leq n - 3 \leq 2 \implies 1 \leq n \leq 5
Removing the absolute value creates a compound inequality bounded between −2-2 and 22.
5
List all valid integer solutions and count them.
n∈{−3,1,2,3,4,5}  ⟹  6n \in \{-3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\} \implies 6 integer solutions
Combining the boundary root n=−3n = -3 with the five consecutive integers from 11 to 55 gives 6 integer solutions.

Key Concept

Absolute Value Inequalities with Variable RHS and Boundary Factors
Rate this question