To evaluate overall soil health and nutrient depletion across a 10,000-acre agricultural region, researchers analyzed soil samples collected exclusively from farms that had reported record-low crop yields during the previous harvest season. Finding that 90 percent of the collected samples exhibited severe nitrogen deficiency, the researchers concluded that the soil throughout the entire region is critically depleted of nitrogen. Which of the following best describes a flaw in the researchers' reasoning?
- It draws a sweeping conclusion about the entire region from a sample that is disproportionately drawn from farms prone to poor soil quality.Answer
- BIt presumes without evidence that nitrogen deficiency was the primary cause of the low crop yields reported by the sampled farms.
- CIt fails to consider whether nitrogen levels vary depending on the specific types of crops cultivated across the region.
- DIt overlooks the possibility that chemical fertilization could cause long-term environmental side effects in adjacent ecosystems.
- EIt confuses a decrease in the rate of nitrogen absorption with a decrease in total nitrogen quantity.
Answer
The argument is flawed because it draws a broad conclusion about the entire region from a sample that is disproportionately drawn from farms prone to poor soil quality.
The correct answer identifies a classic selection bias flaw. The researchers attempted to draw a conclusion about all soil across a 10,000-acre region, but gathered data exclusively from farms that experienced record-low crop yields. Farms with poor yields are significantly more likely to have depleted soil than average farms, making the sample unrepresentative of the region as a whole.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Sampling and Generalization Flaws