Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardIdentifying Counterarguments and Opposing Positions

Consider the following argument:

'Pharmaceutical executives contend that extending patent exclusivity periods is essential to funding high-risk biomedical research. However, public health economists observe that protracted exclusivity inflates healthcare expenditures without demonstrably increasing the rate of novel drug discovery. Although industry advocates argue that reduced patent lifespans would deter capital investment in critical therapeutic areas, comparative cross-national data demonstrate that robust public-venture funding effectively offsets private investment declines. Therefore, lengthening patent monopolies is an inefficient strategy for fostering pharmaceutical innovation.'

Which of the following correctly matches each claim from the passage with its structural role in the overall argument?

  • Extending patent exclusivity periods is essential to funding high-risk biomedical research.The primary opposing position held by industry executives that the argument overall seeks to evaluate and reject.
  • Protracted exclusivity inflates healthcare expenditures without demonstrably increasing the rate of novel drug discovery.Empirical evidence introduced to directly counter the necessity claim of the initial opposing stance.
  • Reduced patent lifespans would deter capital investment in critical therapeutic areas.A defensive counter-claim raised by advocates to justify maintaining long patents despite cost concerns.
  • Lengthening patent monopolies is an inefficient strategy for fostering pharmaceutical innovation.The main conclusion reached by the author after addressing the opposing claims and counterarguments.

Answer

The correct pairings align each statement from the passage to its precise structural function: the executive assertion matches the primary opposing position; the economist observation matches the empirical counter-evidence; the advocate warning matches the secondary defensive counter-claim; and the final sentence matches the author's main conclusion.
Each statement is correctly mapped based on its logical relationship within the text: the executive assertion serves as the primary opposing position; the economist observation supplies empirical counter-evidence against it; the advocate assertion introduces a defensive counter-claim; and the final sentence expresses the author's main conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage structure and identify key transition words.
Pivot words such as 'However', 'Although', and 'Therefore' signal shifts between opposing positions, counterarguments, defensive claims, and the main conclusion.
Recognizing structural pivots is essential for accurately mapping the logical relationships between distinct claims in complex Critical Reasoning passages.
2
Identify the main target position and the author's main conclusion.
The executive contention introduces the primary opposing position, while the final sentence preceded by 'Therefore' states the author's ultimate main conclusion.
The passage opens by framing the industry stance it intends to evaluate and ends by declaring the author's final judgment.
3
Distinguish between the two distinct counter-claims presented in the middle of the argument.
The economist observation provides evidence contradicting the executive claim, whereas the advocate warning serves as a defensive counterargument to preserve exclusivity against economic criticisms.
Differentiating an empirical counter-finding from a defensive counter-claim is critical when evaluating multi-viewpoint arguments.

Key Concept

Identifying Counterarguments and Opposing Positions
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Counterarguments and Opposing Positions