Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardSingle-Sentence Inferences

Read the following statement from an analysis of early modern maritime jurisprudence:

"In analyzing seventeenth-century Dutch Admiralty records, legal historian Clara Vane notes that while the High Council initially required explicit sovereign commission letters to grant prize-capturing rights to private vessel captains, by mid-century the Council routinely recognized implicit customary authorizations derived from local municipal charters, provided that the privateer's home port had formally contributed to naval defensive levies in the preceding fiscal year."

Based on the statement above, which of the following can be strictly inferred about a private vessel captain seeking prize-capturing recognition from the High Council during the mid-seventeenth century?

  1. A captain lacking an explicit sovereign commission letter could still be granted prize-capturing rights by the High Council if the captain's home port had formally paid naval defensive levies in the previous fiscal year.Answer
  2. B
    A captain operating under a local municipal charter was automatically guaranteed prize-capturing rights regardless of whether the home port paid naval defensive levies.
  3. C
    The High Council permanently banned the issuance of sovereign commission letters after transitioning to municipal charter authorizations.
  4. D
    Seventeenth-century Dutch municipal charters universally superseded sovereign commission letters in all branches of maritime law.
  5. E
    Private vessel captains actively lobbied the High Council to alter the legal requirements for defensive levy contributions.

Answer

A captain lacking an explicit sovereign commission letter could still be granted prize-capturing rights by the High Council if the captain's home port had formally paid naval defensive levies in the previous fiscal year.
The sentence explicitly states that by mid-century, the High Council routinely recognized implicit authorizations derived from municipal charters for private captains, provided their home port had contributed to naval defensive levies in the preceding fiscal year. Therefore, a captain without a sovereign commission letter could receive prize-capturing rights if this financial condition was met.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core assertion and conditional structure of the sentence.
The target sentence contrasts early-century policy (requiring explicit sovereign letters) with mid-century policy (accepting implicit customary authorizations from municipal charters under a specific proviso).
Single-sentence inference requires mapping exact logical conditions without adding unstated assumptions.
2
Examine the proviso clause: 'provided that the privateer's home port had formally contributed to naval defensive levies in the preceding fiscal year.'
The recognition of implicit authorizations for non-sovereign-commissioned privateers was strictly contingent upon the home port's financial contribution in the prior fiscal year.
Determining validity requires verifying that the condition in the correct choice directly matches the text's explicit constraint.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that must strictly be true based solely on these premises.
The statement asserting that a captain lacking explicit sovereign letters could obtain recognition if the home port paid defensive levies in the prior year is a direct, necessary deduction from the text.
Strict GMAT inferences must contain zero outside speculation or extreme claims.

Key Concept

Single-Sentence Inferences
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Single-Sentence Inferences

More questions from this topic