Question

Difficulty: HardEvaluating Passage Arguments and Claims

Read the passage below and evaluate the statement that follows.

For decades, comparative psychologists attributed the sophisticated tool-manufacturing abilities of New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) strictly to cumulative cultural evolution, akin to human technological transmission. Proponents of this cultural transmission model pointed to regional variations in the design of stepped cut-leaf tools as evidence of localized traditions passed down across generations through social learning. However, recent longitudinal studies on hand-reared, socially isolated individuals have challenged this consensus. Juveniles raised without exposure to adult tutors or pre-fabricated tools nevertheless demonstrated the spontaneous development of functional tool-shaping behaviors, constructing rudimentary stepped tools from Pandanus leaves identical in mechanical logic to those found in the wild.

These findings suggest that while social learning may refine motor precision, the foundational cognitive scripts and motor patterns for tool geometry are genetically canalized rather than culturally inherited. Skeptics of the genetic model contend that isolated juveniles still require environmental exposure to raw leaf materials, arguing that interaction with the physical medium acts as a catalyst for cognitive mapping. Yet this objection fails to distinguish between environmental triggers necessary for gene expression and social transmission of novel information. Because the structural template of the tool emerges independently of observational learning, the claim that regional variation uniquely demonstrates cumulative culture remains unpersuasive; such variation could equally reflect localized micro-adaptations to vegetation rigidity.

Statement: Based on the passage, the author's argument implies that regional variations in New Caledonian crow tool design cannot serve as conclusive evidence for cumulative cultural transmission because such variations can be accounted for by environmental factors without requiring social learning.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is True.
The statement accurately reflects the author's evaluation of the claim regarding regional variation. In the concluding sentence, the author explicitly states that regional variation 'remains unpersuasive' as sole proof of cumulative culture because localized environmental conditions—specifically micro-adaptations to vegetation rigidity—offer a competing explanation that does not depend on social learning.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary claim made in the statement to be evaluated.
The statement asserts that the author considers regional variation in tool design inconclusive for proving cumulative cultural transmission because environmental factors could explain the variation without social learning.
Establishing the precise logic of the statement is necessary to compare it against the passage's arguments.
2
Locate the relevant evidence and reasoning in the passage regarding regional variation.
The passage states that 'the claim that regional variation uniquely demonstrates cumulative culture remains unpersuasive; such variation could equally reflect localized micro-adaptations to vegetation rigidity.'
Evaluating an argument's validity requires checking whether the author's explicit premise matches the statement's attribution.
3
Synthesize the author's counterargument against the cultural transmission model.
Because micro-adaptations to local vegetation rigidity represent an environmental factor operating independently of observational social learning, regional variation does not provide conclusive proof of culture.
This confirms that the statement accurately summarizes the author's logical evaluation of the evidence.

Key Concept

Evaluating Passage Arguments and Alternative Explanations
Rate this question