Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying Primary Purpose and Main Idea

For decades, evolutionary biologists faced a conceptual paradox regarding the persistence of sexual reproduction despite its substantial genetic costs. Under classical models, an asexual female passes all of her genes to offspring, whereas a sexual female passes only half, theoretically giving asexual lineages a two-fold reproductive advantage that should lead to the rapid competitive exclusion of sexual populations.

To resolve this discrepancy, early theorists posited that sexual reproduction evolved primarily to facilitate the purge of deleterious mutations. However, this mutation-clearing hypothesis failed to explain why sexual populations persist in dynamic ecological environments where mutation rates are exceptionally low.

More recent empirical research on Potamopyrgus antipodarum, a freshwater snail species featuring coexisting sexual and asexual populations, offers a more robust explanation rooted in host-parasite coevolution. Investigators observed that in habitats characterized by high parasite density, sexual individuals significantly outnumber asexual clones. Because parasites rapidly adapt to infect the most common local genotypes, clonal populations suffer severe frequency-dependent mortality over successive generations. Conversely, the novel genetic combinations generated by sexual recombination present a continually moving target for parasitic infection. In parasite-free shallow waters, however, asexual clones quickly dominate the population, confirming the inherent numerical advantage of asexual reproduction when coevolutionary pressures are absent.

Ultimately, these findings demonstrate that ecological interactions can continuously offset the substantial costs of sex. Rather than viewing sexual reproduction as a universal evolutionary ideal or a mere mechanism for mutation repair, evolutionary biologists must recognize that its maintenance depends heavily on localized biotic selection pressures, such as parasite-driven coevolutionary arms races.

Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of the passage?

  1. To present empirical research that offers a resolution to an evolutionary paradox concerning sexual reproduction.Answer
  2. B
    To detail how parasitic infection rates vary between deep and shallow water habitats in freshwater snail populations.
  3. C
    To argue that classical evolutionary models were incorrect in asserting that asexual reproduction carries a two-fold advantage.
  4. D
    To prove that asexual reproduction is an evolutionary dead end across all ecological environments.
  5. E
    To refute the mutation-clearing hypothesis by demonstrating that genetic mutations have no influence on organismal fitness.

Answer

The primary purpose of the passage is to present empirical research that offers a resolution to an evolutionary paradox concerning sexual reproduction.
The correct answer accurately summarizes the overall purpose of the passage. The author begins by framing a classical paradox (why sexual reproduction persists despite its two-fold cost), mentions an earlier inadequate theory, introduces recent empirical evidence on freshwater snails, and concludes that host-parasite coevolution provides the key to resolving the paradox.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structural outline of the passage.
Paragraph 1 introduces the paradox (the two-fold cost of sex). Paragraph 2 notes an incomplete early explanation (mutation clearing). Paragraph 3 presents empirical snail research (host-parasite coevolution). Paragraph 4 summarizes the broader takeaway.
Tracking structural flow helps distinguish the main point from supporting evidence.
2
Synthesize the author's main point and overall objective.
The author aims to explain why sexual reproduction persists despite its heavy theoretical cost, using recent snail research as the key resolving evidence.
The primary purpose must cover the whole text rather than an isolated paragraph or detail.
3
Evaluate option choices against overall scope.
The option stating that the passage presents empirical research offering a resolution to the paradox matches the overall scope perfectly.
Distractors either focus on single details, overstate claims, or misrepresent passage premises.

Key Concept

Identifying Primary Purpose and Main Idea
Rate this question