Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumLogical Arguments and Causal Relationships

A marine biology research team conducted a two-year observational study to investigate a sharp decline in sea urchin populations following the deployment of new modular coastal breakwaters. The researchers hypothesized that trace copper leaching from the metallic reinforcement bars within the breakwaters directly caused the increased sea urchin mortality.

Match each logical argument role on the left with the statement on the right that best fulfills that role in evaluating the researchers' causal claim.

  • Statement that most strongly weakens the researchers' causal hypothesisSea urchin mortality rates in the monitored districts began rising significantly eight months before the modular breakwaters were constructed.
  • Statement that most strongly strengthens the researchers' causal hypothesisIn neighboring coastal zones where identical modular breakwaters without metallic copper reinforcement were deployed, sea urchin populations remained stable.
  • Statement that exemplifies a causal direction reversalDying sea urchins release biochemical compounds that accelerate the corrosion and leaching of copper from submersed metallic structures.

Answer

The statement regarding mortality rates rising prior to breakwater construction weakens the hypothesis; the statement comparing breakwaters without copper reinforcement strengthens the hypothesis; and the statement claiming dying urchins accelerate copper leaching exemplifies a causal direction reversal.
Matching the statement showing mortality preceded breakwaters to the weakening role is correct because a cause cannot postdate its effect. Matching the statement comparing copper-free breakwaters to the strengthening role is correct because it acts as a control isolating the copper variable. Matching the statement claiming dying urchins cause copper leaching to the causal reversal role is correct because it inverts the direction of causality.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stem's causal claim.
The researchers claim that copper leaching from breakwater reinforcement bars (Cause) leads to increased sea urchin mortality (Effect).
Establishing clear cause and effect boundaries is essential before evaluating potential strengthening, weakening, or reversed statements.
2
Evaluate candidate statements for weakening the claim.
The observation that urchin mortality increased eight months prior to breakwater deployment shows that the effect preceded the cause, invalidating the proposed causal link.
A cause cannot occur after its effect.
3
Evaluate candidate statements for strengthening the claim.
The control group finding—where identical breakwaters without copper resulted in stable urchin populations—isolates copper as the specific causal driver.
Eliminating alternative explanations and showing that removing the cause eliminates the effect strengthens a causal argument.
4
Identify the statement representing a causal direction reversal.
The statement asserting that dying urchins accelerate copper leaching posits that the mortality event causes the copper leaching, reversing the hypothesized causal vector.
Causal reversal occurs when the outcome variable is mistaken for the driver variable.

Key Concept

Logical Arguments and Causal Relationships in Two-Part Analysis
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Logical Arguments and Causal Relationships

More questions from this topic