Consider the following argument from a corporate governance debate:
Investor: 'The CEO's proposal to transition 20% of our delivery fleet to electric vehicles should be rejected. The CEO holds personal stock in an electric charging infrastructure firm, so this proposal is merely an attempt to advance her private financial interests rather than improve our operational efficiency.'
True or False: The investor's argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it commits an ad hominem flaw by dismissing a policy proposal based on the proponent's alleged personal motives rather than evaluating the proposal's intrinsic merits.
Answer: Answer
Answer
True
The argument is flawed because it rejects a business proposal based entirely on an attack on the speaker's perceived self-interest rather than assessing the proposal's actual strategic or financial value. This directly matches the definition of an ad hominem flaw, making the evaluated statement True.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Ad Hominem Flaw