Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumSingle-Sentence Inferences

Consider the following sentence from an academic analysis of nineteenth-century urban governance: "In her reexamination of municipal infrastructure reforms, historian Elena Vance contends that city councils authorized expanded sewer networks not out of a primary commitment to public health equity, but rather to protect commercial real estate values in developing mercantile districts."

True or False: According to the excerpt, Vance asserts that economic considerations regarding commercial real estate outweighed public health commitments as the primary driver for expanding sewer networks.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True
The text directly establishes that infrastructure expansion was undertaken 'not out of a primary commitment to public health equity, but rather to protect commercial real estate values', demonstrating that economic interests were the primary motive over health equity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Parse the logical structure of the target sentence.
The sentence relies on the contrast construction 'not out of [X], but rather [Y]', where X represents 'a primary commitment to public health equity' and Y represents 'to protect commercial real estate values'.
Identifying contrast markers is essential for establishing which claim the author supports and which claim the author rejects or downplays.
2
Compare the statement with the sentence's parsed logic.
The statement asserts that economic considerations (protecting commercial real estate) were the primary driver over public health equity, which matches the sentence's assertion precisely.
A valid inference from a single sentence must mirror the explicit logical relationships defined by the text.

Key Concept

Single-Sentence Inference: Identifying explicit logical contrasts and causal attributions within a single complex sentence.
Rate this question

Topics

Single-Sentence Inferences

More questions from this topic