Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardEvaluating Argument Validity and Test of Variance

Consider the following argument: A regional hospital system plans to replace all traditional brass door handles across its facilities with handles coated in a novel antimicrobial polymer coating in order to reduce patient infection rates. Hospital administrators reason that because laboratory tests demonstrate the polymer kills 99 percent of surface bacteria within fifteen minutes of contact, installing these coated handles will significantly decrease the incidence of hospital-acquired infections.

True or False: Determining whether the routine chemical cleaning solutions used by hospital sanitation staff rapidly degrade the antimicrobial efficacy of the polymer coating upon contact constitutes a valid application of the Test of Variance for evaluating the validity of the administrators' argument.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is True. Assessing whether hospital cleaning chemicals degrade the antimicrobial polymer coating is a valid test of variance because two opposite extreme answers yield opposite logical impacts on the conclusion.
The statement is correct because the proposed evaluation directly targets a necessary condition for the real-world success of the hospital's plan. Applying the Test of Variance shows that if hospital disinfectants destroy the polymer coating, the conclusion is invalid, whereas if the disinfectants leave the coating undamaged, the premise holds in practice.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core argument structure
Premise: Laboratory tests show a polymer coating kills 99% of bacteria within 15 minutes. Conclusion: Installing polymer-coated door handles in hospitals will significantly decrease patient infection rates.
Understanding the premise-to-conclusion gap is required to evaluate what unstated assumptions link laboratory results to real-world outcomes.
2
Apply the two opposite extreme outcomes of the Test of Variance to the candidate evaluation question
Extreme Outcome 1: Cleaning chemicals DO rapidly degrade the polymer coating. Extreme Outcome 2: Cleaning chemicals DO NOT degrade the polymer coating.
The Test of Variance tests argument validity by checking if opposite polar responses exert opposite logical forces on the conclusion.
3
Analyze the logical impact of each extreme outcome on the conclusion
If degradation occurs rapidly, the handles lose their antibacterial properties under actual hospital protocols, causing the plan to fail (weakens the argument). If degradation does not occur, the polymer remains effective as demonstrated in labs (supports the argument).
Because one extreme outcome invalidates the plan while the opposite extreme outcome preserves its likelihood of success, the evaluated factor is crucial for assessing argument validity.

Key Concept

Evaluating Argument Validity via the Test of Variance
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Evaluating Argument Validity and Test of Variance

More questions from this topic