All practice questions

2195 questions

Question 361Question

For over half a century, Mayanist historiography was dominated by an ecological-collapse paradigm positing that unchecked population growth led to widespread deforestation, severe topsoil erosion, and the eventual catastrophic abandonment of Classic Maya urban centers. However, this narrative was fundamentally challenged when airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping revealed that vast swaths of the Maya Lowlands were covered by sophisticated networks of agricultural terracing and wetland canalization, demonstrating a far greater capacity for environmental engineering than previously assumed.

In response to these remote-sensing discoveries, an initial wave of revisionist scholars argued that these extensive landscape modifications represented a triumph of socio-ecological resilience. According to this view, terracing effectively trapped nutrient-rich sediments and conserved soil moisture, thereby neutralizing the threat of erosion and enabling continuous, high-yield agrarian production. The revisionist model thus framed the Classic Maya collapse not as an inevitable ecological disaster, but as an anomaly that must have stemmed from non-environmental factors such as geopolitical conflict or trade disruption.

More recently, however, high-resolution geoarchaeological soil core analysis has introduced a crucial qualification to this revisionist consensus. While confirming that terracing initially retarded sediment loss, these core samples indicate that the intensive construction and maintenance of terraces demanded immense, rigid labor commitments. When multi-decadal droughts struck the region during the terminal Classic period, this labor-intensive infrastructure became a vulnerability rather than a safeguard: as crop yields declined, communities could neither maintain the physical integrity of the terraces nor pivot to alternative subsistence strategies without incurring catastrophic social disruption.

Ultimately, the evolving scholarship suggests a more nuanced synthesis. Rather than viewing Maya terracing as either an ineffective defense against environmental degradation or an absolute guarantee of ecological resilience, modern researchers increasingly conceptualize it as a rigid technology that heightened systemic fragility. The collapse is thus best understood as a structural mismatch between a highly specialized, labor-intensive agrarian infrastructure and an unpredictable macro-climatic regime.

Which of the following best describes the overall rhetorical plan of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It introduces an established historical paradigm and new findings that challenged it, describes a revisionist theory based on those findings, presents counter-evidence that exposes limitations in the revisionist view, and concludes by proposing an integrative theoretical synthesis.

Answer

The option stating that the passage introduces an established historical paradigm and new findings that challenged it, describes a revisionist theory based on those findings, presents counter-evidence that exposes limitations in the revisionist view, and concludes by proposing an integrative theoretical synthesis accurately describes the overall rhetorical plan of the text.
The correct answer accurately reflects the four-part rhetorical architecture of the passage: Paragraph 1 outlines the long-standing ecological-collapse paradigm and introduces LiDAR discoveries that challenged it; Paragraph 2 articulates the revisionist theory built upon those findings; Paragraph 3 uses recent geoarchaeological soil core data as a counter-pivot to demonstrate the weaknesses of the revisionist theory; and Paragraph 4 unifies these perspectives into a broader theoretical synthesis regarding structural rigidity and environmental vulnerability.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Paragraph 1 functional role
Identified the introduction of the traditional 'ecological-collapse' paradigm and the emergence of new LiDAR data that challenged this paradigm.
Establishes the historical baseline and the empirical trigger for re-evaluation.
2
Analyze Paragraph 2 functional role
Identified the description of the revisionist perspective, which interpreted terracing as evidence of socio-ecological resilience.
Shows how scholars initially reacted to the new LiDAR findings by forming an alternative hypothesis.
3
Analyze Paragraph 3 functional role and transition pivot
Identified the pivot marker ('More recently, however') introducing geoarchaeological soil core evidence that qualifies and refutes the revisionist view by revealing labor rigidity.
Exposes the critical flaw/limitation in the revisionist interpretation.
4
Analyze Paragraph 4 functional role
Identified the author's synthesis reconciling the competing viewpoints into a cohesive structural framework (terracing as a rigid technology).
Provides the overall resolution and primary conclusion of the passage.

Key Concept

Analyzing Overall Passage Rhetorical Structure and Argument Flow
Question 362Question

A logistics company uses two types of automated cargo drones, Drone X and Drone Y, to complete long-distance freight deliveries.

- Drone X travels at a constant speed of 40 km/h40\text{ km/h} and consumes energy at a constant rate of 15 kWh/h15\text{ kWh/h}.
- Drone Y travels at a constant speed of 60 km/h60\text{ km/h} and consumes energy at a constant rate of 25 kWh/h25\text{ kWh/h}.

On a completed joint mission, the two drones traveled a combined total distance of 480 km480\text{ km} and consumed a combined total energy of 190 kWh190\text{ kWh}.

In the table below, select the number of hours that Drone X operated and the number of hours that Drone Y operated during this mission.

Drone X Operating TimeDrone Y Operating TimeHours
[ ][ ]3
[ ][ ]4
[ ][ ]5
[ ][ ]6
[ ][ ]8

Which of the following correctly identifies the operating time, in hours, for Drone X and Drone Y, respectively?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Drone X: 6 hours; Drone Y: 4 hours

Answer

Drone X operated for 6 hours and Drone Y operated for 4 hours.
The system of equations 40tX+60tY=48040 t_X + 60 t_Y = 480 and 15tX+25tY=19015 t_X + 25 t_Y = 190 uniquely yields tX=6t_X = 6 and tY=4t_Y = 4. Substituting Drone X = 6 hours and Drone Y = 4 hours gives a total distance of 40(6)+60(4)=480 km40(6) + 60(4) = 480\text{ km} and a total energy consumption of 15(6)+25(4)=190 kWh15(6) + 25(4) = 190\text{ kWh}, perfectly matching both given conditions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Set up a system of two linear equations representing total distance and total energy consumption.
Let tXt_X be the operating time of Drone X in hours, and tYt_Y be the operating time of Drone Y in hours.
Distance equation: 40tX+60tY=48040 t_X + 60 t_Y = 480
Energy equation: 15tX+25tY=19015 t_X + 25 t_Y = 190
Distance is calculated as speed×time\text{speed} \times \text{time} and energy as rate×time\text{rate} \times \text{time}.
2
Simplify both linear equations by dividing by their greatest common divisors.
Dividing the distance equation by 20 gives: 2tX+3tY=242 t_X + 3 t_Y = 24.
Dividing the energy equation by 5 gives: 3tX+5tY=383 t_X + 5 t_Y = 38.
Simplifying coefficients reduces computational complexity during elimination.
3
Solve the system using elimination.
Multiply 2tX+3tY=242 t_X + 3 t_Y = 24 by 3: 6tX+9tY=726 t_X + 9 t_Y = 72.
Multiply 3tX+5tY=383 t_X + 5 t_Y = 38 by 2: 6tX+10tY=766 t_X + 10 t_Y = 76.
Subtract the first multiplied equation from the second: (6tX+10tY)(6tX+9tY)=7672    tY=4 hours(6 t_X + 10 t_Y) - (6 t_X + 9 t_Y) = 76 - 72 \implies t_Y = 4\text{ hours}.
Eliminating tXt_X allows direct solving for tYt_Y.
4
Substitute tY=4t_Y = 4 back into 2tX+3tY=242 t_X + 3 t_Y = 24 to solve for tXt_X.
2tX+3(4)=24    2tX+12=24    2tX=12    tX=6 hours2 t_X + 3(4) = 24 \implies 2 t_X + 12 = 24 \implies 2 t_X = 12 \implies t_X = 6\text{ hours}.
Determines the exact value for Drone X's operating duration.

Key Concept

Simultaneous Linear Equations with Work and Rate Constraints
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 363Question

An automated data processing pipeline evaluates five sequential stages (k=1,2,3,4,5k = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) to process machine learning workloads. At the start (k=0k = 0), the system state is defined by Storage S0=10 GBS_0 = 10\text{ GB} and System Load L0=20%L_0 = 20\%. At each subsequent stage kk, the state vector (Sk,Lk)(S_k, L_k) updates according to the following rules:

- Stage 1 (Data Scrubbing): S1=S0+15S_1 = S_0 + 15, L1=L0+10L_1 = L_0 + 10
- Stage 2 (Feature Extraction): S2=2×S1S_2 = 2 \times S_1, L2=L1+15L_2 = L_1 + 15
- Stage 3 (Model Training): S3=S210S_3 = S_2 - 10, L3=L2+25L_3 = L_2 + 25
- Stage 4 (Batch Validation): S4=S3+20S_4 = S_3 + 20, L4=L330L_4 = L_3 - 30
- Stage 5 (System Deployment): S5=S425S_5 = S_4 - 25, L5=L4+50L_5 = L_4 + 50

The pipeline performance metric at any stage is defined as Mk=Sk+LkM_k = S_k + L_k.

Arrange the five stages in increasing order of their pipeline performance metric MkM_k (from smallest value to largest value).

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct increasing order of the stages by metric MkM_k is Data Scrubbing (M1=55M_1 = 55), Feature Extraction (M2=95M_2 = 95), Batch Validation (M4=100M_4 = 100), Model Training (M3=110M_3 = 110), and System Deployment (M5=125M_5 = 125).
Tracking each state sequentially yields M1=55M_1 = 55, M2=95M_2 = 95, M3=110M_3 = 110, M4=100M_4 = 100, and M5=125M_5 = 125. Arranging these from smallest to largest places Batch Validation (M4=100M_4 = 100) before Model Training (M3=110M_3 = 110).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate state vector and metric for Stage 1
S1=10+15=25S_1 = 10 + 15 = 25, L1=20+10=30    M1=25+30=55L_1 = 20 + 10 = 30 \implies M_1 = 25 + 30 = 55
Apply state transformation rules for Stage 1 starting from initial condition (S0=10,L0=20)(S_0=10, L_0=20).
2
Calculate state vector and metric for Stage 2
S2=2×25=50S_2 = 2 \times 25 = 50, L2=30+15=45    M2=50+45=95L_2 = 30 + 15 = 45 \implies M_2 = 50 + 45 = 95
Apply state transformation rules using values from Stage 1.
3
Calculate state vector and metric for Stage 3
S3=5010=40S_3 = 50 - 10 = 40, L3=45+25=70    M3=40+70=110L_3 = 45 + 25 = 70 \implies M_3 = 40 + 70 = 110
Apply state transformation rules using values from Stage 2.
4
Calculate state vector and metric for Stage 4
S4=40+20=60S_4 = 40 + 20 = 60, L4=7030=40    M4=60+40=100L_4 = 70 - 30 = 40 \implies M_4 = 60 + 40 = 100
Apply state transformation rules using values from Stage 3.
5
Calculate state vector and metric for Stage 5
S5=6025=35S_5 = 60 - 25 = 35, L5=40+50=90    M5=35+90=125L_5 = 40 + 50 = 90 \implies M_5 = 35 + 90 = 125
Apply state transformation rules using values from Stage 4.
6
Sort the computed metric values in ascending order
M1(55)<M2(95)<M4(100)<M3(110)<M5(125)M_1 (55) < M_2 (95) < M_4 (100) < M_3 (110) < M_5 (125)
Ordering the values yields Data Scrubbing, Feature Extraction, Batch Validation, Model Training, and System Deployment.

Key Concept

Sequential state tracking requires evaluating recursive function rules step-by-step before applying ordering logic.
Question 364Question

A regional health authority conducted a study across corporate workplaces to evaluate the impact of mandatory 15-minute guided mindfulness breaks introduced twice daily. Over a six-month trial, participating companies reported a 25% decrease in formal employee sick leave requests. Based on this outcome, the health authority concluded that the mindfulness breaks directly improved employee physical health and reduced illness incidence. Analysts and independent researchers provided four statements regarding these results.

Match each analytical statement with the precise logical role it plays in evaluating the health authority's causal argument.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Employees who participated in the breaks also voluntarily engaged in higher rates of personal exercise prior to and throughout the study period than non-participating control groups.
During the exact six-month trial period, participating companies also introduced a new remote-work policy allowing employees to work from home when feeling mildly unwell.
The reduction in sick leave requests occurred predominantly among employees reporting high baseline work stress, whereas sick leave rates remained unchanged in non-participating control companies operating under identical baseline conditions.
Employees reported avoiding formal sick leave submissions because they mistakenly believed doing so would forfeit annual wellness bonuses tied to program attendance.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Each analytical statement correctly matches its respective logical role in causal argument evaluation: baseline exercise differences represent Selection Bias / Pre-existing Confounder; the new remote-work policy represents an Alternative Causal Explanation; concentrated stress-reduction with control validation represents Strengthening Evidence; and fear of losing bonuses represents a Measurement Artifact / Reporting Incentive Shift.
The correct pairings accurately classify each statement according to standard critical reasoning principles: pre-existing habit differences indicate selection bias; concurrent operational changes represent alternative explanations; controlled subgroup variance provides strengthening support; and metric distortion due to incentive perception represents a measurement artifact.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the central causal claim made by the health authority.
The authority claims: Guided mindfulness breaks (Cause) directly led to improved physical health and reduced illness, measured via sick leave requests (Effect).
Evaluating logical arguments requires isolating the proposed cause, effect, and metric of measurement.
2
Evaluate the first statement regarding voluntary personal exercise.
It highlights pre-existing health habits in the participant pool, which points to selection bias rather than the intervention's efficacy.
When study subjects possess inherent baseline advantages, outcome differences cannot be attributed solely to the tested variable.
3
Evaluate the second statement regarding the simultaneous remote-work policy.
It presents an alternative cause for decreased formal sick leave filings (working from home while sick).
A confounding variable introduced concurrently with the treatment offers a competing explanation for the outcome.
4
Evaluate the third statement regarding stress-group concentration and control stability.
It confirms that the outcome occurred where expected (high-stress groups) and did not occur without the treatment (control groups).
Differentiating results between treatment and control groups while showing expected subgroup responsiveness strengthens a causal connection.
5
Evaluate the fourth statement regarding bonus forfeiture concerns.
It reveals that actual sickness may not have dropped, but rather employee willingness to officially report sick leave changed.
An incentive that discourages reporting alters the metric itself without changing the underlying health state being measured.

Key Concept

Causal Fallacies, Confounding Variables, and Argument Evaluation in Observational Data
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 365Question

Passage:
In evolutionary ecology, the phenomenon of "trophic decoupling latency" describes a systemic vulnerability that arises when an obligate predator species and its primary prey rely on different environmental cues to regulate their seasonal lifecycles. Typically, the predator species relies on photoperiodism—invariant photoperiod cues such as day length—to trigger its reproductive cycle, whereas the prey species responds directly to ambient thermal shifts to initiate breeding and emergence. During periods of rapid climatic warming, the prey species advances its lifecycle earlier in the spring, decoupling the timing of maximum prey availability from the peak nutritional demands of offspring predator rearing.

Crucially, the ecological impact of this temporal mismatch is not immediately apparent in overall predator abundance. Because adult predators possess sufficient metabolic resilience to survive the seasonal food deficit, adult mortality rates remain baseline in the short term, masking the underlying crisis. However, because newly hatched offspring suffer near-total mortality due to the absence of synchronized prey, recruitment into the breeding population halts entirely. Consequently, the predator population maintains a deceptive numerical stability for several years until the aging adult cohort reaches natural senescence, at which point the population experiences a sudden, irreversible collapse without prior warning signals.

Which of the following scenarios is most analogous to the phenomenon of "trophic decoupling latency" as described in the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A legacy software enterprise maintains stable annual revenue because existing corporate clients are bound by multi-year service contracts, but its failure to adopt modern integration standards prevents it from acquiring new subscriptions, resulting in an abrupt financial collapse once the legacy contracts expire.

Answer

The scenario involving a legacy software enterprise maintaining stable revenue through multi-year contracts while failing to acquire new subscriptions, leading to an abrupt collapse upon contract expiration, is most analogous.
The correct answer isolates the essential functional framework of 'trophic decoupling latency': a system appears stable in headline metrics due to the endurance of legacy components (adult predators / existing multi-year corporate contracts), even though the mechanism for generating new units (offspring recruitment / new client subscriptions) has failed entirely. Once the legacy components naturally expire, the system suffers a sudden collapse without early aggregate warning signs.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core underlying mechanism of the concept in the passage
Identified three structural phases of trophic decoupling latency: (1) dual decoupled cues cause reproduction/recruitment failure, (2) aggregate metrics remain deceptively stable because existing adults survive, and (3) a sudden, complete collapse occurs once the existing cohort naturally expires.
Establishing abstract structural rules is required to evaluate parallel logical scenarios across different domains.
2
Evaluate candidate options against the abstracted structural framework
The option describing the legacy software enterprise perfectly mirrors all three phases: long-term contracts maintain aggregate revenue (short-term stability), lack of modern integration prevents new client acquisition (recruitment failure), and contract expiration leads to sudden bankruptcy (delayed collapse).
Correct analogy items require structural identity between the passage mechanism and the new domain scenario.

Key Concept

Applying Passage Concepts to Analogous Situations
Question 366Question

A telecommunications provider observed a 25% drop in subscriber churn in service areas where it concurrently upgraded its cell tower network to 5G and introduced a free device-protection plan for long-term contract holders. Company executives concluded that the speed improvements from the 5G upgrades were directly responsible for the reduction in subscriber churn. Which of the following statements, if true, provide valid logical evaluations that weaken the executives' causal conclusion? (Select all that apply.)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In service areas where the 5G tower upgrades were completed but the free device-protection plan was not offered, subscriber churn rates remained unchanged.; Subscribers in control markets who received the free device-protection plan without any 5G network upgrades experienced a comparable 25% drop in churn.

Answer

The two statements that weaken the executives' conclusion are the one showing that 5G upgrades alone caused no change in churn in areas without device protection, and the one showing that device protection alone produced an identical 25% drop in churn without 5G upgrades.
To weaken a causal claim derived from two simultaneous interventions, a valid response must isolate the variables. The statement establishing that churn remained unchanged when 5G upgrades were implemented without device protection proves that 5G speed improvements alone were not sufficient to reduce churn. Similarly, the statement demonstrating an identical 25% churn drop in markets receiving only device protection provides a strong alternative explanation for the outcome. Together, these two statements logically dismantle the executives' conclusion that 5G upgrades were the cause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the causal argument and premise structure in the stem.
Premise: Two simultaneous changes occurred (5G upgrades and free device protection) alongside a 25% drop in churn. Conclusion: 5G upgrades directly caused the drop.
Evaluating a causal claim requires identifying whether conflated variables or alternative explanations exist.
2
Evaluate statements that test for confounding variables or variable isolation.
The statement showing no churn change in 5G-only areas isolates 5G and shows it is insufficient on its own. The statement showing a 25% churn drop in protection-only areas presents a viable alternative cause.
Showing that the supposed cause fails to produce the effect when isolated, or that the effect occurs without the supposed cause, invalidates a claim of exclusive causality.
3
Filter out irrelevant statements or logical fallacies.
Statements reversing causal direction, mentioning single-source tunnel vision, or discussing budget constraints do not logically weaken the causal relationship.
Only empirical or logical counter-evidence regarding the stated variables can effectively weaken a causal conclusion.

Key Concept

Evaluating Causal Arguments and Confounding Variables in Two-Part Scenarios
Question 367Question

Until recently, ethnomusicologists and archivists studying acoustic oral traditions operated primarily under an archival paradigm that emphasized textualization—the systematic transcription of vocal performances into Western prescriptive notation and the storage of field recordings as static artifacts in central institutions. Proponents of this tradition argued that rigorous codification was essential to safeguard ephemeral musical repertoire from generational decay, particularly in indigenous communities experiencing rapid socio-linguistic shifts. However, critical theorists have increasingly challenged this framework, pointing out that Western notation fundamentally distorts oral traditions by imposing rigid metric grids and equal-temperament scales onto microtonal inflections and fluid, elastic rhythmic structures. Moreover, static archival preservation treats dynamic performance traditions as frozen artifacts, stripping songs of their localized social contexts and interactive performance dynamics.

In response to these acknowledged limitations, a modern school of contemporary researchers advocates for a "participatory digital repository" model. Rather than aiming for authoritative, definitive transcription, this approach utilizes interactive digital platforms where community practitioners dynamically annotate audio recordings, upload regional performance variants, and document contextual oral histories in real time. By shifting the locus of archival authority from academic curators to active community members, participatory repositories attempt to recreate the living transmission pathways characteristic of traditional oral cultures.

Yet, this dynamic model is not without its own significant structural vulnerabilities. Skeptics observe that digital participatory platforms often presuppose reliable technological infrastructure and widespread digital literacy—conditions that remain unevenly distributed across rural or economically marginalized regions. Furthermore, unmediated community contributions can lead to conflicting attribution claims over communal repertoire, creating legal friction when digitized assets cross into global commercial domains. Consequently, while participatory digital repositories successfully address the cultural inflexibility of traditional codification, they inadvertently introduce complex technological and governance dilemmas that require nuanced, hybrid management strategies.

Which of the following best describes the overall logical structure of the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It outlines an established preservation methodology and its key criticisms, presents an alternative model created to address those criticisms, and evaluates the operational challenges associated with the new model.

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that the passage outlines an established preservation methodology and its key criticisms, presents an alternative model created to address those criticisms, and evaluates the operational challenges associated with the new model.
The correct choice accurately reflects the three-part rhetorical arc of the text: first introducing traditional archival textualization and its flaws, then detailing the participatory digital repository model developed to fix those flaws, and finally evaluating the technological and legal complications stemming from the new model.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the functional role of Paragraph 1.
Identified that Paragraph 1 introduces the traditional textualization paradigm (codification in Western notation) and presents two major criticisms of it (notation distortion and loss of social context).
Establishing the initial concept and its limitations sets up the core problem the passage addresses.
2
Analyze the functional role of Paragraph 2.
Identified that Paragraph 2 introduces a solution: the 'participatory digital repository' model designed to overcome the limitations of static archival codification.
This paragraph introduces the alternative methodology responding directly to the criticisms in the first paragraph.
3
Analyze the functional role of Paragraph 3 and synthesize the overall flow.
Identified that Paragraph 3 transitions with 'Yet' to highlight vulnerabilities of the new model (infrastructure issues, legal/attribution conflicts) and concludes that a hybrid approach is needed.
Synthesizing the three paragraphs reveals a structure of: Traditional Practice & Criticisms → Alternative Solution → Assessment of Alternative's Challenges.

Key Concept

Passage Logical Organization and Rhetorical Structure
Question 368Question

A chemical processing plant prepares a batch of solution by mixing two stock liquid compounds, Solution A and Solution B, to form an initial mixture with a total mass of 480 kg480\text{ kg}. Solution A contains 25%25\% active compound by mass, and Solution B contains 5%5\% active compound by mass. Solution A and Solution B are combined in a mass ratio of 3:13:1, respectively.

To satisfy export specifications, technicians must raise the active compound concentration of the entire mixture to 25%25\% by mass by adding a quantity of pure active compound. How many kilograms of pure active compound must be added to the 480 kg480\text{ kg} mixture?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 32

Answer

32 kg of pure active compound must be added to reach a final concentration of 25% active compound by mass.
The initial mixture consists of 360 kg of Solution A and 120 kg of Solution B. This contains a total of 96 kg of active compound (90 kg from A and 6 kg from B). Adding 32 kg of pure active compound brings the total active compound to 128 kg and total mixture mass to 512 kg, yielding an exact concentration of 128 / 512 = 25%.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate the mass of Solution A and Solution B in the initial mixture
Solution A = 360 kg, Solution B = 120 kg
The total mass of 480 kg is divided according to the 3:1 ratio (3/4 and 1/4).
2
Calculate the mass of pure active compound in the initial mixture
Initial active compound = 96 kg
Solution A provides 25% of 360 kg (90 kg) and Solution B provides 5% of 120 kg (6 kg).
3
Set up an equation for the final concentration after adding x kg of active compound
(96 + x) / (480 + x) = 1/4
Adding pure active compound increases both the mass of the active compound and the total mass of the mixture by x kg.
4
Solve for x
x = 32 kg
Cross-multiplying gives 4(96 + x) = 480 + x, which simplifies to 3x = 96.

Key Concept

Weighted average mixtures and algebraic optimization of concentration ratios
Question 369Question

An automated logistics drone starts an operation at Cycle k=0k = 0 with an initial battery charge of C0=100%C_0 = 100\% and a payload mass of P0=40 kgP_0 = 40\text{ kg}. At the end of each subsequent cycle kk (where k=1,2,3,4k = 1, 2, 3, 4), the payload mass decreases by 8 kg8\text{ kg} according to Pk=Pk18P_k = P_{k-1} - 8, and the remaining battery charge updates according to the state transition rule Ck=Ck1(5+0.2Pk1)%C_k = C_{k-1} - (5 + 0.2 P_{k-1})\%. Match each operational cycle on the left with its exact state (Ck,Pk)(C_k, P_k) at the end of that cycle on the right.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

End of Cycle 1
End of Cycle 2
End of Cycle 3
End of Cycle 4

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

End of Cycle 1 matches with C_1 = 87.0%, P_1 = 32 kg; End of Cycle 2 matches with C_2 = 75.6%, P_2 = 24 kg; End of Cycle 3 matches with C_3 = 65.8%, P_3 = 16 kg; End of Cycle 4 matches with C_4 = 57.6%, P_4 = 8 kg.
Each cycle follows the recursive state equations P_k = P_{k-1} - 8 and C_k = C_{k-1} - (5 + 0.2 P_{k-1}). Evaluating step by step yields the exact matching pairs for all four cycles.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate state values at the end of Cycle 1 (k = 1)
P_1 = 40 - 8 = 32 kg; C_1 = 100 - (5 + 0.2 * 40) = 100 - 13 = 87.0%
Use the state transition formula using initial values P_0 = 40 and C_0 = 100.
2
Calculate state values at the end of Cycle 2 (k = 2)
P_2 = 32 - 8 = 24 kg; C_2 = 87.0 - (5 + 0.2 * 32) = 87.0 - 11.4 = 75.6%
Apply the recursive transition rules to the state obtained at k = 1.
3
Calculate state values at the end of Cycle 3 (k = 3)
P_3 = 24 - 8 = 16 kg; C_3 = 75.6 - (5 + 0.2 * 24) = 75.6 - 9.8 = 65.8%
Apply the recursive transition rules to the state obtained at k = 2.
4
Calculate state values at the end of Cycle 4 (k = 4)
P_4 = 16 - 8 = 8 kg; C_4 = 65.8 - (5 + 0.2 * 16) = 65.8 - 8.2 = 57.6%
Apply the recursive transition rules to the state obtained at k = 3.

Key Concept

Sequential Process and Recursive State Transition Tracking
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 370Question

A high-tech manufacturing firm produced a batch of 150150 electronic assemblies. Each assembly in the batch underwent standard quality testing by Inspector Alpha, Inspector Beta, or both. Exactly 9090 assemblies were tested by Inspector Alpha and 105105 assemblies were tested by Inspector Beta. What was the average (arithmetic mean) testing duration per assembly for the entire batch of 150150 assemblies?

(1) The average testing duration for assemblies tested only by Inspector Alpha was 1212 minutes, and the average testing duration for assemblies tested only by Inspector Beta was 1818 minutes.
(2) The average testing duration for assemblies tested by both Inspector Alpha and Inspector Beta was 2525 minutes.

Which of the following statements provides sufficient information to answer the question?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient.

Answer

Both statements together are sufficient to determine a unique average duration, but neither statement alone is sufficient.
The correct response identifies that both statements combined provide all required subgroup averages. Using the overlapping set counts established in the rephrased question stem (4545 Alpha-only, 6060 Beta-only, and 4545 Both), the three subgroup averages supplied across both statements allow for a unique calculation of the overall weighted average.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Apply the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion to find the number of assemblies in each mutually exclusive subgroup.
Total=N(Alpha)+N(Beta)N(Both)    150=90+105N(Both)    N(Both)=45\text{Total} = N(\text{Alpha}) + N(\text{Beta}) - N(\text{Both}) \implies 150 = 90 + 105 - N(\text{Both}) \implies N(\text{Both}) = 45. Thus, N(Alpha only)=9045=45N(\text{Alpha only}) = 90 - 45 = 45, N(Beta only)=10545=60N(\text{Beta only}) = 105 - 45 = 60, and N(Both)=45N(\text{Both}) = 45.
Before evaluating the statements, rephrasing the stem by partitioning the set into three non-overlapping groups simplifies the weighted average equation.
2
Evaluate Statement (1) alone.
Statement (1) provides Mean(Alpha only)=12\text{Mean}(\text{Alpha only}) = 12 minutes and Mean(Beta only)=18\text{Mean}(\text{Beta only}) = 18 minutes. However, Mean(Both)\text{Mean}(\text{Both}) remains unknown. The overall sum of testing durations cannot be determined. Statement (1) is NOT sufficient.
We cannot compute a weighted mean of three groups if one group's mean is completely missing.
3
Evaluate Statement (2) alone.
Statement (2) provides Mean(Both)=25\text{Mean}(\text{Both}) = 25 minutes. However, Mean(Alpha only)\text{Mean}(\text{Alpha only}) and Mean(Beta only)\text{Mean}(\text{Beta only}) are unknown. Statement (2) is NOT sufficient.
Without the average durations for the single-inspector groups, the total testing duration cannot be computed.
4
Evaluate Statements (1) and (2) combined.
Combining both statements gives all three subgroup means: 1212 minutes for 4545 assemblies, 1818 minutes for 6060 assemblies, and 2525 minutes for 4545 assemblies. Total testing duration =45(12)+60(18)+45(25)=540+1080+1125=2745= 45(12) + 60(18) + 45(25) = 540 + 1080 + 1125 = 2745 minutes. The overall average duration is 2745150=18.3\frac{2745}{150} = 18.3 minutes. Statements (1) and (2) together are SUFFICIENT.
Knowing all subgroup sizes and all subgroup means enables exact calculation of the overall mean.

Key Concept

Overlapping Sets and Weighted Averages in Data Sufficiency
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 371Question

In 2025, a nationwide logistics firm installed AI-driven route optimization software across its entire delivery fleet to reduce fuel consumption per trip. Over the following year, fuel prices remained completely stable, and the average fuel consumed per delivery dropped by 15 percent. Paradoxically, the firm's total annual fuel expenditure for the fleet increased by more than 10 percent over the same period.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The efficiency gained from the software enabled the firm to secure new commercial accounts and complete 40 percent more total deliveries during the year than in the previous year.

Answer

The apparent discrepancy is resolved by the option explaining that the efficiency gained enabled the firm to complete 40 percent more total deliveries, increasing total fuel consumption despite lower fuel usage per trip.
The correct answer resolves the discrepancy by introducing a third variable: total delivery volume. Total fuel expenditure equals fuel per trip multiplied by total trips. If the fuel per delivery drops by 15 percent but the total number of deliveries increases by 40 percent, overall fuel consumption and expenditure will increase despite the improved per-trip efficiency.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two paradox premises.
Premise 1: Average fuel used per delivery decreased by 15%. Premise 2: Total annual fuel expenditure for the fleet increased by over 10% (with stable fuel prices).
Resolving a paradox requires finding a missing factor that allows both premises to be true simultaneously.
2
Analyze the mathematical relationship between rate and total volume.
Total Fuel Used = (Fuel Consumed per Delivery) × (Total Number of Deliveries).
If fuel per delivery falls, total fuel can only rise if the total number of deliveries increases significantly.
3
Evaluate the options for a factor that expands total volume sufficiently.
A 40% increase in total deliveries accounts for a higher total fuel consumption even when each delivery uses 15% less fuel.
This accounts for both facts without contradicting either premise.

Key Concept

Rate versus Total Volume Discrepancy
Question 372Question

An urban planning committee observed that metropolitan neighborhoods with a high density of public community gardens reported significantly lower rates of stress-related cardiovascular conditions among residents than did neighborhoods with few or no community gardens. The committee concluded that exposure to community gardens directly reduces stress levels, thereby reducing the incidence of cardiovascular conditions among urban residents. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The neighborhoods that established community gardens were also those selected for major municipal investments in extensive pedestrian walkways and cycling paths, which significantly increased regular physical exercise among residents.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the statement pointing out that neighborhoods with community gardens also received major municipal investments in pedestrian walkways and cycling paths, which significantly increased regular physical exercise among residents.
The correct answer identifies an alternative cause (a confounding variable) for the lower incidence of cardiovascular conditions in those specific neighborhoods. If the neighborhoods with gardens also received major infrastructure improvements that led to increased physical exercise among residents, the improved health outcomes may be due to exercise rather than exposure to community gardens. This severely weakens the claim of a direct causal link between gardens and reduced cardiovascular conditions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premise
Premise: Neighborhoods with high garden density have lower rates of stress-related cardiovascular conditions. Conclusion: Exposure to community gardens directly reduces stress and cardiovascular conditions.
Understanding the precise causal claim (gardens cause lower cardiovascular illness) allows evaluation of logical vulnerabilities.
2
Identify the logical flaw
The argument assumes a correlation between community gardens and lower cardiovascular disease implies direct causation, ignoring potential confounding variables (third factors).
Causal arguments based on observational data are vulnerable to alternative factors that cause the observed effect.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for a confounding variable
The statement regarding new pedestrian walkways and cycling paths shows that increased physical exercise, rather than exposure to community gardens, could account for the reduced cardiovascular illness.
Providing a plausible third variable that accounts for the health outcome directly weakens the author's specific causal conclusion.

Key Concept

Causal Flaws and Confounding Variables
Question 373Question

From 2015 to 2025, solar power generation in Country X expanded rapidly, growing from supplying 5 percent of the nation's total electricity consumption to 20 percent. Over the same ten-year period, the average greenhouse gas emissions per megawatt-hour of electricity generated from non-solar sources decreased by 10 percent. Total electricity consumption in Country X increased by 50 percent between 2015 and 2025.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The total volume of greenhouse gas emissions produced by non-solar electricity generation in Country X was greater in 2025 than it was in 2015.

Answer

The total volume of greenhouse gas emissions produced by non-solar electricity generation in Country X was greater in 2025 than it was in 2015.
The conclusion that non-solar greenhouse gas emissions were greater in 2025 than in 2015 is mathematically inescapable. Setting 2015 total consumption to 100 units yields 95 non-solar units at rate RR (95R95R emissions). A 50 percent growth in total electricity by 2025 yields 150 units, 80 percent of which is non-solar (120 units). At a reduced rate of 0.90R0.90R, non-solar emissions equal 120×0.90R=108R120 \times 0.90R = 108R, which exceeds 95R95R.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Calculate 2015 baseline non-solar production and emissions
If 2015 Total Electricity = 100 units, Non-Solar Electricity = 95 units (95%). With emission rate RR, 2015 Emissions = 95R95R.
Establishes the quantitative starting point based on stimulus premises.
2
Calculate 2025 total electricity and non-solar production
2025 Total Electricity = 100×1.50=150100 \times 1.50 = 150 units. Non-Solar Share = 100%20%=80%100\% - 20\% = 80\%. Non-Solar Electricity = 150×0.80=120150 \times 0.80 = 120 units.
Combines total consumption growth (+50%) with the new solar grid proportion (20%).
3
Calculate 2025 non-solar emissions rate and total non-solar emissions
2025 Emission Rate = 0.90R0.90R. 2025 Non-Solar Emissions = 120×0.90R=108R120 \times 0.90R = 108R.
Applies the 10% rate reduction to the new non-solar production volume.
4
Compare 2015 and 2025 absolute emissions
108R>95R108R > 95R, proving non-solar emissions increased by 13.68%.
Identifies the logically inescapable deduction.

Key Concept

Disentangling Percentage Proportions from Absolute Quantities
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 374Question

A major automotive assembly plant recently replaced its manual welding lines with automated robotic arms, resulting in a 30 percent decline in the total number of physical injuries reported by line workers over the following year. Paradoxically, during the exact same period, the average number of workdays lost per worker due to job-related injuries increased by nearly 40 percent, even though safety reporting standards, total workforce size, and overall operating hours remained unchanged.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent paradox described above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The installation of automated welding equipment allowed the plant to reassign many line workers to heavy-equipment assembly, where injuries occur less frequently but are substantially more severe.

Answer

The apparent paradox is resolved by the statement that line workers were reassigned to heavy-equipment assembly, where injuries occur less frequently but are substantially more severe.
The correct resolution identifies a shift in worker tasks that simultaneously lowers overall injury frequency while increasing average injury severity. Reassigning workers to heavy-equipment assembly explains why fewer total injuries occurred (accounting for the 30 percent decline) and why the injuries that did occur resulted in significantly longer recovery periods (accounting for the 40 percent increase in lost workdays per worker).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two contradictory premises in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Total physical injuries reported by line workers dropped by 30%. Premise 2: Average workdays lost per worker due to injuries increased by nearly 40%.
Resolving a paradox requires identifying both conflicting facts that must be reconciled simultaneously.
2
Determine the necessary condition for a correct resolution.
The correct option must explain how injury frequency can decrease while injury severity (measured in lost workdays) increases.
A valid resolution cannot deny either premise; it must supply a third factor that connects lower frequency with higher average duration per injury.
3
Evaluate the choices against both premises.
Reassigning workers to heavy-equipment assembly accounts for fewer total injuries (lowering overall count) and greater injury severity (raising lost workdays per worker).
This subgroup composition shift accounts for both premises at the same time.

Key Concept

Resolving Paradoxes and Discrepancies
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 375Question

A local agricultural extension office recently advised fruit orchard owners to plant wildflower strips along the perimeter of their crop fields. The office reasoned that these wildflower strips would attract a larger population of wild bees, which in turn would increase pollination and boost overall fruit yields per acre.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the extension office's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Wildflower strips also attract a species of pest beetle that consumes fruit blossoms, destroying more blossoms than the additional wild bees can pollinate.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the finding that wildflower strips attract pest beetles that destroy more blossoms than the wild bees can pollinate.
The core argument claims that planting wildflower strips will increase overall fruit yields because the strips attract wild bees that increase pollination. The statement about pest beetles reveals an unintended consequence of planting wildflower strips: attracting beetles that destroy more blossoms than the extra bees can pollinate. This net loss of fruit blossoms directly undermines the conclusion that fruit yields per acre will increase.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premises and conclusion
Premise: Wildflower strips attract wild bees, increasing pollination. Conclusion: Planting wildflower strips will boost overall fruit yields per acre.
Understanding the logical jump from increased bee attraction to increased yield is required to evaluate potential weak points.
2
Determine the unstated assumption
The author assumes that attracting wild bees via wildflower strips will not produce counteracting negative factors that offset or exceed the benefits of additional pollination.
Weakening questions often target hidden assumptions regarding plan feasibility or unintended side effects.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information undermining the conclusion
The statement regarding pest beetles shows a direct side effect that reduces blossom viability beyond what extra pollination gains, preventing an increase in total fruit yields.
Information demonstrating that a plan produces a net negative effect on its goal shatters the argument's conclusion.

Key Concept

Weakening Arguments
Question 376Question

A water utility company in a drought-prone city plans to install automated pressure-regulating valves across its subterranean pipe network. The utility argues that by dynamically reducing water pressure during low-usage overnight hours, it will significantly decrease the total volume of water lost through minor background pipe leaks across the city.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the water utility company's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In unmanaged pipe networks, water pressure naturally reaches its daily peak during overnight hours, when low residential demand causes a surge in baseline pressure.

Answer

The argument is most strongly supported by the fact that in unmanaged pipe networks, water pressure naturally reaches its daily peak during overnight hours when residential demand is low.
The argument concludes that reducing water pressure during low-usage overnight hours will significantly decrease total water loss from background pipe leaks. The option explaining that water pressure naturally reaches its daily peak during overnight hours due to low residential demand directly supports this claim. It demonstrates that overnight hours are precisely when unmanaged pipes experience the highest stress and leakage rates, meaning targeted overnight pressure reduction will prevent a substantial volume of lost water.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument
Premise: Automated pressure valves will reduce water pressure during overnight hours. Conclusion: This action will significantly decrease total water lost through minor pipe leaks across the city.
Strengthening requires finding a premise that reinforces the logical connection between the proposed action (overnight pressure reduction) and the expected outcome (significant reduction in total leak volume).
2
Evaluate the underlying assumption and logical gap
The argument assumes that overnight hours are a significant contributor to overall leakage or that pressure reduction overnight will yield substantial volume savings.
If pressure is not particularly high overnight or if overnight leakage is negligible, reducing overnight pressure would not produce a significant overall decrease.
3
Select the choice that validates the underlying mechanism
Establishing that water pressure naturally surges to its daily peak overnight confirms that overnight hours account for a major portion of pipe leakage, making overnight pressure management highly impactful.
Connecting low demand to high baseline pressure validates why targeting overnight hours specifically yields a significant reduction in total lost water.

Key Concept

Strengthening Arguments by Confirming Key Operational Assumptions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 377Question

Historically, municipal water utilities facing severe drought conditions have implemented tier-based pricing structures that dramatically increase per-gallon rates for high-volume consumers. Economists reasoned that raising the marginal cost of excess usage would compel households to reduce discretionary consumption, such as lawn irrigation. Recent empirical data, however, reveals that in municipalities where tier-based pricing was instituted alongside subsidies for water-efficient household appliances, overall water consumption decreased significantly less than in municipalities that implemented tier-based pricing alone. This disparity occurs because the financial savings produced by the subsidized appliances effectively buffer households against the higher marginal cost of discretionary water use. Therefore, a municipal policy intended to maximize water conservation by combining tier pricing with appliance subsidies will likely prove ineffective unless ________.

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: the marginal rates for high-volume water consumption are set high enough to outweigh the monetary savings generated by the appliance subsidies

Answer

The correct completion is that the marginal rates for high-volume water consumption are set high enough to outweigh the monetary savings generated by the appliance subsidies.
The passage establishes that the combined policy fails because the monetary savings from appliance subsidies offset the higher marginal rates of tier-based pricing, eliminating the economic disincentive to conserve discretionary water. To prevent this failure (i.e. 'unless...'), the financial penalty imposed by the high-volume marginal rate must exceed the savings gained from the appliance subsidies, ensuring that excess water usage remains net-costly to the household.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core argument structure and premises in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Tiered pricing increases marginal costs to reduce discretionary water use. Premise 2: Adding appliance subsidies resulted in LESS overall water reduction than tiered pricing alone. Premise 3 (Mechanism): Financial savings from subsidized appliances offset the higher cost of discretionary water use.
Understanding the causal conflict is necessary to identify what missing condition restores the policy's effectiveness.
2
Identify the logical gap created by the conclusion stem ending in 'unless'.
The passage asserts the combined policy will fail 'unless' a specific condition neutralizes the offsetting mechanism.
The word 'unless' introduces a necessary condition to prevent the stated failure.
3
Synthesize the mechanism to find the necessary condition.
Since failure occurs because appliance savings >= price increase penalty, success requires price increase penalty > appliance savings.
If the marginal rate penalty is greater than the financial savings from the subsidy, households will no longer have a net buffer to finance discretionary water use.

Key Concept

Completing the Passage via Paradox Neutralization / Mathematical Balance in Arguments
Question 378Question

For three positive integers aa, bb, and cc, the greatest common divisor of any pair among them is 1212, and the least common multiple of all three integers is 5,0405,040. If a=60a = 60, what is the minimum possible value of b+cb + c?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: 228228

Answer

The minimum possible value of b+cb + c is 228228.
The value 228228 is correct because prime factor analysis shows bb and cc must take exponents {4,2}\{4, 2\} for prime 2, {2,1}\{2, 1\} for prime 3, {0,0}\{0, 0\} for prime 5, and {1,0}\{1, 0\} for prime 7. Combining 24×32=1442^4 \times 3^2 = 144 and 22×31×71=842^2 \times 3^1 \times 7^1 = 84 satisfies all pairwise GCD and LCM conditions while minimizing the sum to 144+84=228144 + 84 = 228.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Express the given numbers and conditions in prime factorized form.
The pairwise GCD is 12=22×3112 = 2^2 \times 3^1. The LCM of a,b,ca, b, c is 5,040=24×32×51×715,040 = 2^4 \times 3^2 \times 5^1 \times 7^1. Given a=60=22×31×51a = 60 = 2^2 \times 3^1 \times 5^1.
Prime factorization allows exact determination of the minimum and maximum required exponent for each prime factor across a,b,a, b, and cc.
2
Determine the prime factor exponent constraints for bb and cc.
For prime factor 2: min exponent is 2, max is 4. Since aa has 222^2, exponents for (b,c)(b,c) for factor 2 must be {4,2}\{4, 2\} to minimize sum.
For prime factor 3: min exponent is 1, max is 2. Since aa has 313^1, exponents for (b,c)(b,c) for factor 3 must be {2,1}\{2, 1\}.
For prime factor 5: since gcd(a,b)=12\gcd(a,b) = 12 and gcd(a,c)=12\gcd(a,c) = 12, 5 cannot divide bb or cc. Thus exponents for factor 5 are both 0.
For prime factor 7: max exponent is 1 in LCM, but aa has 707^0 and pairwise GCD has 707^0, so exactly one of bb or cc has 717^1 and the other has 707^0.
The pairwise GCD dictates the minimum exponent present in all pairs, while the overall LCM dictates the maximum exponent present across the three numbers.
3
Test allocations of exponents to minimize b+cb + c.
We must distribute exponents {4,2}\{4, 2\} for 2, {2,1}\{2, 1\} for 3, and {1,0}\{1, 0\} for 7 between bb and cc.
Allocation 1: b=24×32=144b = 2^4 \times 3^2 = 144 and c=22×31×71=84    b+c=228c = 2^2 \times 3^1 \times 7^1 = 84 \implies b + c = 228.
Allocation 2: b=24×31=48b = 2^4 \times 3^1 = 48 and c=22×32×71=252    b+c=300c = 2^2 \times 3^2 \times 7^1 = 252 \implies b + c = 300.
Allocation 3: b=24×31×71=336b = 2^4 \times 3^1 \times 7^1 = 336 and c=22×32=36    b+c=372c = 2^2 \times 3^2 = 36 \implies b + c = 372.
Allocation 4: b=24×32×71=1008b = 2^4 \times 3^2 \times 7^1 = 1008 and c=22×31=12    b+c=1020c = 2^2 \times 3^1 = 12 \implies b + c = 1020.
Comparing all valid exponent combinations reveals the minimum sum.
4
Identify the minimum sum.
The minimum sum is 228228.
The smallest sum among all valid combinations is 144+84=228144 + 84 = 228.

Key Concept

Prime factor exponent extraction for pairwise GCD and joint LCM of three numbers
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 379Question

A statement determining that a real variable xx satisfies the quadratic equation x25x+6=0x^2 - 5x + 6 = 0 is sufficient to answer the Data Sufficiency question 'Is xx an integer?', but is insufficient to answer the Data Sufficiency question 'What is the value of xx?'

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

The statement is True because both solutions x=2x = 2 and x=3x = 3 produce a definitive 'Yes' to the integer question, satisfying Yes/No sufficiency, whereas the existence of two distinct numerical values fails to satisfy Value sufficiency.
Solving the equation x25x+6=0x^2 - 5x + 6 = 0 gives x=2x = 2 and x=3x = 3. Because both values are integers, the answer to 'Is xx an integer?' is a definitive 'Yes' regardless of which root is chosen, making the statement sufficient for the Yes/No structure. However, because xx can equal either 22 or 33, a single unique value cannot be pinpointed, rendering the statement insufficient for the Value structure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Solve the quadratic equation in the statement for all possible real values of xx.
x25x+6=0(x2)(x3)=0x^2 - 5x + 6 = 0 \Rightarrow (x - 2)(x - 3) = 0, so x=2x = 2 or x=3x = 3.
Identify the complete solution set permitted by the statement.
2
Evaluate the solution set against the Yes/No question 'Is xx an integer?'.
If x=2x = 2, xx is an integer (Yes). If x=3x = 3, xx is an integer (Yes). The answer is conclusively 'Yes' in all cases.
In Yes/No Data Sufficiency, a statement is sufficient if it guarantees a single definitive outcome (always Yes or always No).
3
Evaluate the solution set against the Value question 'What is the value of xx?'.
xx can be either 22 or 33. Since two distinct values are possible, the value of xx is not uniquely determined.
In Value Data Sufficiency, a statement is sufficient if and only if it leads to exactly one unique numerical value.
4
Compare the analytical results with the assertions made in the True/False statement.
The statement accurately classifies the equation as sufficient for the Yes/No question and insufficient for the Value question. Therefore, the statement is True.
Confirm alignment between analytical findings and the prompt statement.

Key Concept

Value vs. Yes/No Data Sufficiency Decision Logic
Question 380Question

Consider the following international aerospace guidelines: A private satellite operator is granted a commercial orbital license only if its collision-avoidance system passes an automated telemetry audit. Passing an automated telemetry audit requires maintaining an active propulsion unit capable of immediate de-orbiting maneuvers.

Based on these guidelines, evaluate the following statement:
"If a private satellite operator maintains an active propulsion unit capable of immediate de-orbiting maneuvers, that operator is guaranteed to be granted a commercial orbital license."

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False. The statement commits a mistaken reversal fallacy because having an active propulsion unit is a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition, for receiving a commercial orbital license.
The evaluated statement is logically false because it commits a mistaken reversal. The rules state that receiving a license requires passing an audit, which in turn requires an active propulsion unit (License → Audit → Propulsion). Thus, maintaining a propulsion unit is merely a necessary prerequisite for obtaining a license, not a guarantee of receiving one.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Formalize the conditional premises from the passage
License → Telemetry Audit, and Telemetry Audit → Active Propulsion. Combining these yields the conditional chain: License → Telemetry Audit → Active Propulsion.
Identifying the directional relationships establishes which conditions are necessary versus sufficient.
2
Translate the evaluated statement into formal conditional logic
The statement asserts: Active Propulsion → License.
We must compare the claimed implication against the premises to test logical validity.
3
Evaluate the validity of the deduction
Claiming that Active Propulsion → License reverses the necessary condition chain (License → Active Propulsion). This is an invalid deduction known as a mistaken reversal.
Meeting a necessary requirement does not guarantee that the outcome itself will occur.

Key Concept

Mistaken Reversal in Conditional Reasoning Chains
Estimated Time:1m 30s
PreviousPage 19 / 110Next
All practice questions — GMAT | Examkin