Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation

176 questions

Question 1Question

Read the argument below and match each boldfaced statement to its precise structural role within the reasoning.

Some urban planners claim that the city council should not enact the proposed mandate requiring all new commercial buildings to install reflective white roofs. These planners contend that white roofs rapidly accumulate atmospheric soot, rendering them ineffective within two years. However, long-term field testing demonstrates that periodic rainfall naturally washes away over 85 percent of soot deposits from modern reflective roofing materials. Therefore, dirt accumulation does not significantly diminish the long-term cooling efficiency of white roofs, and the council should proceed with implementing the mandate.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

The statement: 'the city council should not enact the proposed mandate requiring all new commercial buildings to install reflective white roofs'
The statement: 'dirt accumulation does not significantly diminish the long-term cooling efficiency of white roofs'
The statement: 'the council should proceed with implementing the mandate'

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The statement opposing the mandate matches the opposing claim; the statement regarding cooling efficiency matches the intermediate conclusion countering the opponents' objection; and the statement recommending implementation matches the main conclusion of the argument.
Matching statement 1 with the opposing claim correctly identifies the position that the author rejects. Matching statement 2 with the intermediate conclusion recognizes that it is a claim derived from rainfall evidence and used to dismantle the opponents' objection. Matching statement 3 with the main conclusion correctly isolates the primary judgment supported by the entire passage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the overall stance and main conclusion of the author.
The author argues in favor of passing the mandate, explicitly concluding in the final statement that 'the council should proceed with implementing the mandate.'
Establishing the main conclusion clarifies the ultimate goal of the passage.
2
Analyze the role of the first boldfaced statement.
The first boldfaced statement presents the view of 'some urban planners' who argue against enacting the mandate. The author directly rejects this view.
Identifying opponent positions helps differentiate between opposing claims and the author's own premises.
3
Analyze the function of the factual evidence and the second boldfaced statement.
The author introduces premise evidence (rainfall cleaning modern materials) to draw a sub-conclusion: dirt accumulation does not significantly diminish efficiency. This sub-conclusion directly addresses and counters the opponents' soot objection.
An intermediate conclusion relies on factual evidence and serves to build logical support toward the main conclusion.

Key Concept

Identifying structural roles of statements in GMAT Critical Reasoning arguments
Question 2Question

To combat declining municipal revenues from downtown parking meters, the city council of Elmridge plans to eliminate the two-hour parking limit on all downtown streets. Council members argue that allowing drivers to park indefinitely will encourage visitors to spend more time dining and shopping in the downtown district, thereby increasing local business sales and boosting the city's sales tax revenues.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the city council's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Eliminating time limits causes downtown office commuters to occupy parking spaces early in the morning for full workdays, drastically reducing space availability for shoppers and diners.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the finding that removing parking time limits will cause full-day office commuters to occupy downtown parking spaces early in the morning, thereby reducing space availability for shoppers and diners throughout the day.
The correct answer weakens the argument by demonstrating an unintended side effect of the plan: full-day office commuters will park early and occupy downtown spaces all day. This severely reduces parking availability for retail customers and diners, neutralizing the intended revenue increase.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the core argument
Premise: Eliminating the 2-hour parking limit allows drivers to park indefinitely. Conclusion: Visitors will stay longer to shop/dine, raising local business sales and city sales tax revenues.
Identifying the link between the plan (removing time limits) and the intended outcome (increased shopper visits and revenue) is essential to finding the unstated assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that shoppers and diners will be the primary beneficiaries of open-ended parking and will find available spaces easily.
A plan-to-goal argument relies on the assumption that the implementation will operate as intended without creating obstacles that defeat the goal.
3
Evaluate the impact of new evidence
If commuters occupy the spaces all day before shoppers arrive, overall customer turnover drops and shoppers cannot park downtown.
Introducing an alternative user group (commuters monopolizing spaces) invalidates the key assumption and demonstrates that the plan will decrease shopper access, directly undermining the conclusion.

Key Concept

Weakening Arguments - Plan Implementation and Unintended Consequences
Question 3Question

To decrease total operating expenses, the Fairview Municipal Water District plans to install bio-purification filters upstream of its primary membrane filtration system. Water district officials note that microplastic debris currently clogs and damages the delicate membrane filters, requiring $2 million annually in replacement and repair costs. Because the new bio-purification filters effectively capture over 90 percent of incoming microplastics before they reach the primary membranes, officials conclude that installing these bio-filters will significantly reduce the facility's overall annual operating costs.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the water district officials' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The chemical solutions required to routinely clean and maintain the bio-purification filters cost substantially more per year than the total annual expenditure for replacing damaged membrane filters.

Answer

The chemical solutions required to routinely clean and maintain the bio-purification filters cost substantially more per year than the total annual expenditure for replacing damaged membrane filters.
The conclusion asserts that adding bio-purification filters will reduce overall annual operating expenses by eliminating 2millioninmembranerepairs.Thislogicreliesontheassumptionthatrunningthebiofilterswillnotgeneratenewexpensesequaltoorgreaterthan2 million in membrane repairs. This logic relies on the assumption that running the bio-filters will not generate new expenses equal to or greater than 2 million. The correct response points out that routine maintenance chemicals for the bio-filters cost substantially more per year than the $2 million saved, demonstrating that the net financial outcome will be an increase in total operating expenses, directly weakening the conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Microplastics cause $2 million in annual damage to membrane filters. Premise: Bio-filters remove 90% of microplastics before reaching membranes. Conclusion: Installing bio-filters will reduce overall annual operating costs.
Identifying the central claim and supporting evidence reveals the underlying assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that the ongoing cost to purchase, operate, and maintain the new bio-filters will be significantly less than the $2 million currently spent on membrane repairs.
A net reduction in total operating costs requires that savings exceed any new expenses incurred by the plan.
3
Evaluate choices for an undermining fact
The statement showing that chemical cleaning solutions for the bio-filters cost more per year than the $2 million membrane repair bill directly breaks the underlying assumption.
If new operational expenses exceed current repair costs, total operating expenses will increase rather than decrease.

Key Concept

Evaluating Plan Feasibility and Net Cost-Benefit Assumptions
Question 4Question

To reduce regional water consumption, an agricultural cooperative plans to distribute automated soil-moisture sensors to all member farms. The sensors send real-time alerts whenever soil moisture drops below an optimal threshold, allowing farmers to irrigate only when necessary rather than on a fixed calendar schedule. The cooperative's directors conclude that installing these sensors will significantly decrease total agricultural water usage across the region over the next two years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the directors' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Most member farmers currently irrigate less than the optimal moisture threshold due to water cost concerns, but plan to increase watering to recommended sensor levels once alerts are automated.

Answer

The directors' argument is most seriously weakened by the finding that most member farmers currently underwater their crops relative to the optimal threshold and intend to increase watering once sensor alerts are implemented.
The conclusion relies on the unstated assumption that current schedule-based irrigation uses more water than sensor-guided optimal irrigation. The correct choice reveals that farmers currently apply less water than the optimal threshold due to costs, and will increase watering once sensor feedback is available. This counter-behavior causes total water consumption to rise, directly undermining the cooperative's objective.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion.
Premise: Automated sensors alert farmers to irrigate only when moisture drops below an optimal threshold, replacing fixed schedules. Conclusion: Regional agricultural water usage will decrease significantly.
Understanding the logical jump from premise to conclusion reveals the implicit assumption.
2
Uncover the central unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that farmers' current fixed schedules deliver more water than the sensor-determined optimal threshold requires.
If current watering is equal to or less than optimal levels, adopting precision sensors will not reduce water volume.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new evidence breaking this assumption.
The statement showing that farmers currently underwater their crops and plan to raise irrigation to match sensor recommendations directly refutes the assumption of net water savings.
If farmers increase watering frequency upon receiving sensor data, overall regional consumption will rise rather than fall.

Key Concept

Weakening Plan-to-Goal Arguments by Identifying Unintended Behavioral Counter-Effects
Question 5Question

A recent study observed that city residents who regularly visit public parks report lower average stress levels than residents who rarely visit parks. Based on this observation, the city council concluded that spending time in public parks directly causes a reduction in stress levels for city residents. The reasoning in the city council's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on which of the following grounds?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It takes for granted that a correlation between two factors proves that one factor directly causes the other.

Answer

The argument is most vulnerable to criticism because it assumes that a correlation between visiting parks and lower stress implies a direct causal relationship.
The correct answer accurately pinpoints the argument's central flaw: inferring a direct cause-and-effect relationship solely from an observed correlation. It is possible that people who already have lower stress levels have more leisure time to visit parks (reverse causality), or that another variable such as higher income enables both park visits and lower stress.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's premise and conclusion
Premise: City residents who visit parks regularly have lower stress levels than those who do not. Conclusion: Visiting parks directly causes reduced stress levels.
Understanding the precise logical gap between the premise and conclusion is essential for identifying the flaw.
2
Evaluate the leap in logic
The argument moves from an observed association (correlation) directly to a claim of direct causation without ruling out other possibilities.
Correlation alone does not establish causation; residents with naturally lower stress might simply have more free time to visit parks, or a third factor (like income or free time) might cause both.
3
Match the logical flaw to the correct choice
The statement highlighting that correlation is mistreated as proof of causation accurately describes this reasoning vulnerability.
This directly points out the central weakness in the city council's causal inference.

Key Concept

Confusing Correlation with Causation
Question 6Question

To increase household incomes in underdeveloped agricultural districts, a telecommunications company plans to deploy low-cost satellite internet service across remote farming villages. The company contends that providing farmers with real-time commodity prices and hyper-local weather forecasts through a mobile application will allow them to optimize their harvest timing and crop sales strategies, thereby substantially raising their net earnings.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the telecommunications company's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The vast majority of farmers in these villages sell their produce to regional distributors under binding multi-year contracts that predetermine fixed delivery dates and prices.

Answer

The fact that most farmers sell their crops under binding multi-year contracts with fixed delivery dates and prices undermines the assumption that real-time market and weather data can alter their harvest and sales behavior.
The argument relies on the key unstated assumption that farmers have the operational flexibility to alter their harvest dates and crop sale strategies based on real-time information. If farmers are bound by multi-year contracts that mandate fixed delivery schedules and non-negotiable prices, receiving real-time data cannot influence their financial outcomes, directly shattering the link between internet deployment and increased earnings.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion and premises of the argument.
Premise: Satellite internet provides real-time prices and weather forecasts. Conclusion: This access will allow farmers to optimize harvest/sales timing and raise net earnings.
Understanding the logic gap between premise and conclusion is essential for identifying unstated assumptions.
2
Determine the central unstated assumption.
The argument assumes farmers possess the operational freedom and market flexibility to act on real-time data by changing when they harvest and at what price they sell.
If farmers cannot alter their harvesting schedule or selling prices, access to real-time information will produce no actionable change in earnings.
3
Evaluate the options to find information that invalidates this central assumption.
Finding that farmers are legally bound by pre-determined fixed-price delivery contracts eliminates their ability to alter sales timing or prices, rendering the real-time information ineffective.
A valid weakener shows a critical flaw or counter-condition that prevents the cause from producing the intended effect.

Key Concept

Plan-to-Goal Feasibility & Unstated Assumptions in Causal Reasoning
Question 7Question

To increase overall bus ridership, the Metro Transit Authority plans to equip all express buses with Transit Signal Priority (TSP) technology. This system communicates with traffic lights to extend green light durations when an express bus approaches an intersection, thereby shortening trip times on express routes. The Authority reasons that by reducing travel times for express bus passengers, deploying TSP on express routes will lead to a net increase in the city's total daily bus ridership.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the Metro Transit Authority's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A substantial majority of express bus passengers rely on local feeder buses to reach express stops, and the extended green lights for express buses will cause longer red lights and severe delays for those intersecting local feeder routes.

Answer

The argument is most weakened by the finding that express bus passengers depend on local feeder buses whose schedules will be severely delayed by the longer red lights created on intersecting streets.
The argument assumes that reducing travel time on express bus routes will result in a net increase in total citywide bus ridership. The correct option reveals a critical flaw in this plan: because the vast majority of express passengers rely on local feeder buses to reach express stops, and because the TSP system lengthens red light durations on intersecting streets, those local feeder buses will face severe delays. Consequently, total commute times for these passengers will not decrease—and may even increase—negating the intended incentive to use public transit and undermining the conclusion that overall ridership will grow.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument structure.
Premise: TSP technology shortens travel time for express buses by extending green lights. Goal/Conclusion: Implementing TSP on express routes will increase total daily bus ridership.
Identifying the explicit link between the plan (shorter express bus travel time) and the expected outcome (increased total ridership) exposes the central assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption.
The argument assumes that shortening express bus travel times will yield a net benefit without introducing countervailing delays elsewhere in the bus network that reduce overall ridership.
A plan-to-goal argument fails if implementation creates negative side effects that outweigh the direct benefit.
3
Evaluate the options for a weakening factor.
The choice showing that local feeder buses will suffer severe delays demonstrates that express riders will experience equal or greater delays before reaching the express bus, negating the incentive to ride.
Demonstrating that the plan undermines its own objective through feeder route delays directly attacks the feasibility of increasing net ridership.

Key Concept

Weakening Plan-to-Goal Arguments via Counterproductive Side Effects
Question 8Question

A commercial shipping line plans to apply a newly developed acoustic barnacle-repellent coating to the hulls of all its ocean-going container ships. Preliminary testing indicates that by preventing marine biofouling, the coating reduces hydrodynamic drag and decreases annual fuel consumption per vessel by 12 percent. Based on these fuel savings, management concludes that the financial savings from decreased fuel consumption will fully offset the high initial cost of purchasing and applying the coating within two years. Which of the following inquiries would be most useful to evaluate the validity of management's conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Whether the continuous acoustic vibrations emitted by the coating cause micro-fractures in vessel hulls that require costly structural repairs within the first two years.

Answer

The most useful inquiry to evaluate the argument is whether the continuous acoustic vibrations emitted by the coating cause micro-fractures in vessel hulls that require costly structural repairs within the first two years.
The correct answer identifies a potential side effect (costly hull repairs caused by acoustic vibrations) that directly affects whether net savings will cover initial installation costs within two years. Applying the Test of Variance shows that if structural repairs are required, the added expense negates the net recovery goal (weakening the argument); if no repairs are needed, fuel savings cleanly cover the initial investment (strengthening the argument).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Acoustic coating prevents biofouling, reducing drag and cutting annual fuel use by 12 percent. Conclusion: Operational fuel savings will fully offset the initial purchase and application costs within two years.
Evaluating an argument requires isolating the explicit leap from premise (fuel savings) to conclusion (net financial recovery within two years).
2
Identify unstated assumptions and potential hidden costs.
The argument assumes that no unmentioned operational or maintenance expenses created by applying the coating will undermine the net financial savings during the two-year period.
If implementing the plan introduces unexpected secondary costs, those costs could cancel out the projected fuel savings.
3
Apply the Test of Variance to the correct evaluation inquiry.
If YES (vibrations cause structural damage requiring costly repairs in the first two years), the extra repair costs will offset fuel savings, causing the plan to fail its two-year cost-recovery target (WEAKENS). If NO (vibrations cause no structural damage or extra repair costs), the projected fuel savings remain unencumbered, supporting two-year cost recovery (STRENGTHENS).
An evaluation choice is valid under GMAT standards if extreme opposite answers yield opposite logical impacts on the conclusion.

Key Concept

Evaluating Argument Validity & Test of Variance
Question 9Question

A tech firm observed that employees who voluntarily chose to work remotely reported higher job satisfaction than those who worked in the office. Based on this observation, management concluded that transitioning all employees to remote work will increase overall employee job satisfaction across the company. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens management's conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Employees who chose remote work were primarily those whose job duties require minimal collaboration, whereas most office-based roles require constant group coordination that suffers remotely.

Answer

The argument is most weakened by showing that the remote employees surveyed had roles unrepresentative of the entire workforce, creating a selection bias that makes the conclusion invalid for office-based positions.
The correct answer weakens the argument by exposing a selection bias. The premise relies on data from employees who voluntarily chose remote work, likely because their specific roles suited it. If office-based roles depend heavily on real-time group coordination that deteriorates in a remote environment, forcing those employees to work remotely will likely decrease satisfaction, invalidating the conclusion that total remote work will raise overall satisfaction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion and premise.
Premise: Voluntarily remote employees report higher satisfaction. Conclusion: Mandating remote work for all employees will increase overall job satisfaction.
Understanding the logic gap requires clearly isolating what the premise proves versus what the conclusion claims.
2
Evaluate the underlying assumption.
Management assumes that the satisfaction experienced by voluntary remote workers will apply equally to all employees regardless of role.
Weakening questions target unstated assumptions connecting the premise to the conclusion.
3
Select the choice that undermines this assumption.
The option showing that voluntary remote workers have fundamentally different job responsibilities than office workers demonstrates that the sample is non-representative, directly undermining the conclusion.
Pointing out selection bias breaks the causal link between the initial observation and the proposed company-wide plan.

Key Concept

Weakening Arguments: Selection Bias and Unrepresentative Samples
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 10Question

Following a major revision to its regulatory standards, an international financial oversight agency began conducting unannounced cybersecurity audits of commercial banks. To avoid severe regulatory fines for non-compliance, virtually all audited banks substantially increased their annual expenditure on advanced threat-detection software and external consulting over the subsequent two years. Surprisingly, data collected at the end of this two-year period revealed that the average financial loss per successful cyberattack at these audited banks increased by over 40 percent, whereas the average loss per successful cyberattack at unaudited financial institutions remained completely unchanged. Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the apparent discrepancy described above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The advanced threat-detection software installed by audited banks successfully intercepts virtually all low-level, low-impact intrusions, leaving only highly sophisticated, catastrophic breaches among the attacks that manage to succeed.

Answer

The apparent discrepancy is best explained by the fact that advanced threat-detection software intercepts routine, low-impact intrusions, ensuring that only highly sophisticated breaches succeed, thereby raising the average financial loss per successful attack.
The correct answer provides a statistical selection mechanism that reconciles both premises. When audited banks install advanced threat-detection software, they successfully block routine, minor attacks before any damage occurs. Consequently, the only attacks that manage to penetrate the bank's defenses are exceptionally sophisticated, high-impact breaches. Removing minor losses from the pool of 'successful cyberattacks' shifts the composition of that pool upward, raising the average loss per successful attack even though total overall damage across all attempted attacks may have declined.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two seemingly contradictory facts presented in the stimulus.
Fact 1: Audited banks significantly increased spending on advanced threat-detection software. Fact 2: The average financial loss per successful cyberattack at audited banks increased by 40%, whereas it remained unchanged at unaudited banks.
Resolving a paradox requires finding a missing factor that allows both premise facts to be true simultaneously.
2
Analyze the mathematical composition of the metric 'average loss per successful attack'.
The metric is calculated as (Total Financial Losses from Successful Attacks) / (Total Number of Successful Attacks).
Understanding how the ratio is structured helps identify how filtering out minor attacks alters the average without indicating a failure of the security measures.
3
Evaluate the impact of filtering out low-level attacks.
If threat-detection software prevents low-severity attacks from succeeding, those low-dollar losses are removed from the numerator and denominator of the 'successful attacks' calculation. The remaining successful attacks consist exclusively of complex, high-dollar breaches, raising the calculated average.
This explains why security spending worked as intended while simultaneously causing the observed statistical increase in loss per breach.

Key Concept

Resolving Rate vs. Composition Paradoxes (Denominator and Selection Effects)
Question 11Question

In 2024, a metropolitan public transit authority replaced its flat-fare structure on suburban commuter lines with a distance-based pricing model, resulting in a 25 percent increase in the average price of long-distance single-ride suburban tickets. Transit analysts predicted this fare hike would decrease total single-ride passenger volume on suburban lines. Surprisingly, over the subsequent twelve months, total single-ride passenger trips recorded across the suburban network increased by 15 percent, even though suburban population growth remained static and no new residential developments were constructed. Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The distance-based fare structure significantly reduced ticket prices for short-distance trips within suburban districts, attracting a large volume of local commuters who previously walked or drove.

Answer

The apparent discrepancy is best resolved by the fact that the distance-based fare structure lowered prices for short-distance suburban trips, driving a substantial surge in local ridership that increased total single-ride trips overall.
The correct answer resolves the paradox by demonstrating that while long-distance single-ride ticket prices rose, the distance-based system concurrently lowered short-distance single-ride ticket prices. The influx of new short-distance riders created a net increase in total single-ride trips across the suburban network, reconciling the 25% price increase on long-distance tickets with the 15% overall increase in single-ride trip volume.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two conflicting premises in the stimulus
Premise 1: Long-distance single-ride suburban tickets increased in price by 25%, leading analysts to expect a drop in suburban transit ridership. Premise 2: Total single-ride trips on suburban lines actually increased by 15% without any population growth.
Resolving a paradox requires finding an underlying cause that permits both premises to be true simultaneously.
2
Evaluate the scope of the price increase versus the scope of the outcome metric
The price increase affected long-distance single-ride tickets specifically, but the outcome metric measures total single-ride trips across the entire suburban network (which includes short-distance trips).
A change in short-distance fare pricing under the new distance-based model could reconcile the overall net increase.
3
Select the option that supplies the missing reconciling variable
The option showing that short-distance ticket prices decreased significantly accounts for a surge in short-distance single-ride trips that offsets any reduction in long-distance trips.
This bridges both stated facts without disputing either premise.

Key Concept

Resolving Paradoxes and Apparent Discrepancies
Question 12Question

To reduce municipal water consumption during severe dry spells, the city of Oakhaven plans to install smart water meters for all residential customers and charge a steep surge tariff whenever an individual household's weekly water usage exceeds a baseline threshold. The city council projects that this financial disincentive will prompt residents to curb non-essential outdoor watering, thereby lowering total municipal water demand by 20 percent over the next summer. Which of the following would it be most useful to determine in evaluating whether the city council's plan will achieve its intended goal?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Whether a substantial proportion of the residential properties that regularly exceed the baseline threshold are rented units whose water bills are paid by property owners rather than by occupants.

Answer

Whether a substantial proportion of the residential properties that regularly exceed the baseline threshold are rented units whose water bills are paid by property owners rather than by occupants.
The plan relies on a financial disincentive (the surge tariff) to compel high-volume water users to reduce their consumption. For this mechanism to work, the individuals making daily water-use decisions must directly experience the financial penalty. Determining whether high-usage properties are occupied by renters whose water bills are paid by landlords directly tests this assumption. If landlords pay the bill, tenants face no price signal, neutralizing the tariff and causing the plan to fail.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the plan's specific goal and proposed causal mechanism.
Goal: Lower total municipal water demand by 20%. Mechanism: Financial surge tariffs on excessive usage will disincentivize residents from overusing water.
Evaluating a plan requires testing whether the causal chain connecting the proposed action to the intended outcome is logically sound.
2
Formulate a Variance Test to identify critical unstated assumptions.
Determine whether the financial disincentive actually reaches the individuals controlling the water consumption.
If landlords pay the utility bills, tenants using the water face no financial penalty and will not alter their consumption habits, breaking the plan's causal chain.
3
Evaluate the two opposite answers to the key parameter.
If YES (most high-usage units are tenant-occupied with landlord-paid bills), the plan fails. If NO (occupants pay their own bills), the plan is far more likely to succeed.
A question whose opposite answers directly determine the success or failure of the plan identifies the most useful information for evaluation.

Key Concept

Evaluating Plans: Variance Test & Causal Linkages
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 13Question

A regional health authority recently mandated that all public hospitals in the province implement a post-discharge digital health monitoring application for heart failure patients. Over the two years following the mandate, readmission rates for heart failure patients at these hospitals dropped by 22 percent. The health authority concluded that the remote monitoring application was directly responsible for the reduction in patient readmissions.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the health authority's conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Whether readmission rates for heart failure patients also experienced a comparable decline at hospitals in neighboring districts that did not introduce the remote monitoring technology during the same timeframe.

Answer

The correct answer is the option inquiring whether readmission rates for heart failure patients also experienced a comparable decline at hospitals in neighboring districts that did not introduce the remote monitoring technology during the same timeframe.
The correct answer establishes a controlled comparison group. Evaluating whether heart failure readmissions dropped similarly at comparable hospitals that lacked the digital application allows us to determine if the application was the true driver of the 22 percent reduction or if an unmentioned regional trend (e.g., changes in standard drug regimens or overall healthcare policies) produced the change.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the Premise and Conclusion
Premise: After public hospitals introduced a digital monitoring application, heart failure readmission rates fell by 22 percent over two years. Conclusion: The digital application caused the reduction in readmissions.
Understanding the precise causal link asserted by the argument is necessary before evaluating its validity.
2
Identify the Causal Flaw / Evaluation Need
The argument assumes correlation equals causation and ignores potential confounding variables or regional trends.
To evaluate a causal claim based on a single temporal event sequence, one must test whether an unstated third variable or broader trend produced the observed effect.
3
Apply Variance Test to Options
Comparing the target hospitals with a control group of non-adopting hospitals isolates the impact of the application from external regional variables.
If non-adopting hospitals saw the same drop, the application was not the cause. If non-adopting hospitals saw no drop, the application's causal role is strongly supported.

Key Concept

Evaluating Causal Arguments via Control Group Comparison
Question 14Question

To mitigate severe summer train delays caused by the thermal expansion of steel tracks, a municipal transit authority plans to coat all exposed rail lines with a solar-reflective ceramic finish. In pilot testing conducted on an unused, stationary track segment, the coating reduced peak surface temperatures by 15°C, keeping the metal well below the critical temperature at which heat-induced warping occurs. The authority concludes that implementing this coating systemwide will successfully eliminate heat-related train slowdowns. Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the transit authority's conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The intense friction generated by the steel wheels of active, heavy train traffic rapidly abrades the ceramic coating, stripping it off the rails within days of operational use.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the fact that the friction of active train traffic rapidly abrades and strips the ceramic coating off the rails within days.
The correct answer undermines a key assumption of the plan: that the ceramic coating will remain effective under real-world operating conditions as it did on an unused test track. By showing that mechanical friction from heavy train traffic rapidly strips the coating off the rails, this choice demonstrates that the plan cannot achieve its goal of preventing summer track warping.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument core
Premise: In a pilot test on an unused, stationary track, solar-reflective ceramic coating lowered peak metal surface temperatures by 15°C, preventing thermal warping. Conclusion: Systemwide application on operational tracks will eliminate heat-related slowdowns.
Identifying the author's logical leap from a stationary test environment to real-world operating conditions reveals the underlying assumption.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The author assumes that conditions on active, heavily trafficked rail lines will not interfere with the coating's durability or thermal performance compared to the stationary test line.
Plan-to-goal arguments rely on the implicit premise that pilot conditions accurately forecast operational realities.
3
Evaluate the impact of new evidence
If high-frequency heavy train traffic removes the coating almost immediately through wheel friction, the coating cannot maintain its reflective benefits, completely undermining the plan's expected outcome.
Showing that real-world operational factors negate the key mechanism demonstrated in the pilot directly breaks the link between the premise and conclusion.

Key Concept

Extrapolation from Pilot Conditions to Operational Environments
Question 15Question

To reduce order fulfillment errors caused by manual sorting, a major online retailer plans to deploy Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) across all its regional distribution centers. Management notes that in pilot tests at a prototype facility, the automated sorting system reduced mispackaged shipments by 80 percent compared to human sorters. Therefore, management concludes that deploying AMRs nationwide will significantly lower overall operational costs associated with shipping errors.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens management's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The specialized technical labor and maintenance fees required to resolve routine AMR sorting malfunctions cost more per incident than the financial losses previously incurred from human mispackaging errors.

Answer

The statement showing that specialized technical maintenance fees for robot sorting errors exceed the losses from human sorting errors.
The conclusion asserts that deploying AMRs will lower overall operational costs associated with shipping errors. The correct answer weakens this argument by demonstrating an unconsidered cost of the new technology: fixing AMR sorting malfunctions requires expensive specialized technicians whose fees exceed the cost of human sorting mistakes. Consequently, even with fewer physical mispackages, the financial cost associated with sorting errors will increase, defeating management's goal.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument structure
Premise: Pilot tests showed an 80% reduction in mispackaged shipments using AMRs compared to human sorters.
Conclusion: Nationwide deployment of AMRs will significantly lower overall operational costs associated with shipping errors.
Identifying the explicit premise and conclusion isolates the central claim and logical gap.
2
Identify the unstated assumption
The argument assumes that the financial savings achieved by preventing human mispackaging errors will not be offset or exceeded by new costs created by the AMR system itself.
A cost-reduction conclusion requires that total expenditures associated with the new process are net lower than under the old process.
3
Evaluate answer choices for an alternative factor that invalidates the net cost reduction
The option pointing out that specialized technical labor and maintenance fees to fix AMR malfunctions cost more per incident than human sorting errors directly shatters the net savings premise.
Showing that new error-handling costs surpass old error losses proves the total operational costs associated with shipping errors will actually rise.

Key Concept

Weakening Cost-Benefit Arguments
Question 16Question

Historians analyzing early twentieth-century iron gall ink manuscripts observed that documents stored in wooden cabinets suffered significantly less paper degradation than identical manuscripts stored in metal cabinets within the same archive room. The archivists concluded that volatile organic compounds emitted by the untreated cedar wood reacted with atmospheric moisture to form a protective barrier on the paper surface, thereby inhibiting acid hydrolysis of the cellulose fibers.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the archivists' conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Manuscripts stored in cedar cabinets whose interior surfaces had been coated with an impermeable synthetic sealant experienced paper degradation rates identical to those of manuscripts stored in metal cabinets.

Answer

The argument is most strengthened by evidence showing that when cedar cabinets are treated with an impermeable sealant that prevents volatile organic compound emissions, the preservation benefit disappears and degradation matches that of metal cabinets.
The archivists claim that the protective effect is specifically caused by volatile organic compounds emitted by cedar wood. The option establishing that sealing the interior of cedar cabinets—preventing those emissions while retaining the cabinet's physical material and structure—eliminates the preservation advantage serves as a classic control experiment. It confirms that the emissions are the active protective agent, strongly supporting the archivists' conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument structure into premise and conclusion.
Premise: Iron gall manuscripts stored in untreated cedar cabinets degraded less than identical manuscripts in metal cabinets in the same room. Conclusion: Volatile organic compounds emitted by cedar wood react with moisture to form a protective barrier that inhibits acid hydrolysis.
Identifying the explicit causal mechanism proposed by the author is essential for evaluating strengthening options.
2
Identify potential vulnerabilities or assumptions in the causal leap.
The author assumes that the chemical emissions themselves are the cause of preservation, rather than secondary physical attributes of wooden cabinets (such as light blockage, temperature insulation, or structural shielding).
A strong strengthening statement will validate the proposed cause by eliminating alternative explanations or testing the mechanism directly.
3
Evaluate the choices to find an option that confirms the proposed cause-and-effect relationship.
The choice showing that blocking cedar emissions with an impermeable sealant results in degradation rates identical to metal cabinets proves that the emissions are necessary for the preservation effect.
Eliminating the hypothesized cause while keeping the physical cabinet structure identical demonstrates a direct causal link.

Key Concept

Strengthening Arguments via Causal Mechanism Isolation
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 17Question

A bookstore chain recently added coffee cafes inside all of its retail locations to boost overall bookstore sales. During the twelve months following the installation of the cafes, total sales at these bookstores increased by 15 percent. The management concluded that adding the cafes was the primary cause of the increase in sales. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the management's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: During the same twelve-month period, the bookstore chain's primary regional competitor closed all of its stores, driving a large influx of new customers to remaining bookstores.

Answer

The statement showing that a major regional competitor closed all stores during the same timeframe most seriously weakens the argument by providing an alternative cause for the increase in sales.
The correct answer weakens the argument by introducing an alternative explanation for the 15 percent increase in bookstore sales. If a major competitor closed all its stores during the exact same period, the sudden influx of displaced customers would account for the sales surge regardless of whether the cafes were added.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premise of the argument.
Premise: Bookstores added cafes, and total sales rose by 15 percent over the next year. Conclusion: Adding the cafes caused the 15 percent sales increase.
Understanding the precise causal claim is essential for finding the flaw or assumption.
2
Identify the underlying unstated assumption.
The author assumes that no other external factor was responsible for the 15 percent increase in sales during that timeframe.
Causal arguments rely on the assumption that correlation implies causation and that alternative causes are absent.
3
Evaluate the options to find new information that breaks the causal connection.
The option noting the closure of the primary regional competitor introduces an independent, plausible alternative cause for the sudden rise in sales.
Demonstrating an alternative explanation directly undermines the conclusion that the cafes were the primary driver of growth.

Key Concept

Causal Reasoning and Alternative Explanations
Question 18Question

A local agricultural extension office recently advised fruit orchard owners to plant wildflower strips along the perimeter of their crop fields. The office reasoned that these wildflower strips would attract a larger population of wild bees, which in turn would increase pollination and boost overall fruit yields per acre.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the extension office's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Wildflower strips also attract a species of pest beetle that consumes fruit blossoms, destroying more blossoms than the additional wild bees can pollinate.

Answer

The argument is most seriously weakened by the finding that wildflower strips attract pest beetles that destroy more blossoms than the wild bees can pollinate.
The core argument claims that planting wildflower strips will increase overall fruit yields because the strips attract wild bees that increase pollination. The statement about pest beetles reveals an unintended consequence of planting wildflower strips: attracting beetles that destroy more blossoms than the extra bees can pollinate. This net loss of fruit blossoms directly undermines the conclusion that fruit yields per acre will increase.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premises and conclusion
Premise: Wildflower strips attract wild bees, increasing pollination. Conclusion: Planting wildflower strips will boost overall fruit yields per acre.
Understanding the logical jump from increased bee attraction to increased yield is required to evaluate potential weak points.
2
Determine the unstated assumption
The author assumes that attracting wild bees via wildflower strips will not produce counteracting negative factors that offset or exceed the benefits of additional pollination.
Weakening questions often target hidden assumptions regarding plan feasibility or unintended side effects.
3
Evaluate the choices to find new information undermining the conclusion
The statement regarding pest beetles shows a direct side effect that reduces blossom viability beyond what extra pollination gains, preventing an increase in total fruit yields.
Information demonstrating that a plan produces a net negative effect on its goal shatters the argument's conclusion.

Key Concept

Weakening Arguments
Question 19Question

A water utility company in a drought-prone city plans to install automated pressure-regulating valves across its subterranean pipe network. The utility argues that by dynamically reducing water pressure during low-usage overnight hours, it will significantly decrease the total volume of water lost through minor background pipe leaks across the city.

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest support for the water utility company's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In unmanaged pipe networks, water pressure naturally reaches its daily peak during overnight hours, when low residential demand causes a surge in baseline pressure.

Answer

The argument is most strongly supported by the fact that in unmanaged pipe networks, water pressure naturally reaches its daily peak during overnight hours when residential demand is low.
The argument concludes that reducing water pressure during low-usage overnight hours will significantly decrease total water loss from background pipe leaks. The option explaining that water pressure naturally reaches its daily peak during overnight hours due to low residential demand directly supports this claim. It demonstrates that overnight hours are precisely when unmanaged pipes experience the highest stress and leakage rates, meaning targeted overnight pressure reduction will prevent a substantial volume of lost water.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument
Premise: Automated pressure valves will reduce water pressure during overnight hours. Conclusion: This action will significantly decrease total water lost through minor pipe leaks across the city.
Strengthening requires finding a premise that reinforces the logical connection between the proposed action (overnight pressure reduction) and the expected outcome (significant reduction in total leak volume).
2
Evaluate the underlying assumption and logical gap
The argument assumes that overnight hours are a significant contributor to overall leakage or that pressure reduction overnight will yield substantial volume savings.
If pressure is not particularly high overnight or if overnight leakage is negligible, reducing overnight pressure would not produce a significant overall decrease.
3
Select the choice that validates the underlying mechanism
Establishing that water pressure naturally surges to its daily peak overnight confirms that overnight hours account for a major portion of pipe leakage, making overnight pressure management highly impactful.
Connecting low demand to high baseline pressure validates why targeting overnight hours specifically yields a significant reduction in total lost water.

Key Concept

Strengthening Arguments by Confirming Key Operational Assumptions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 20Question

Historians studying 19th-century agrarian developments have long maintained that the adoption of synthetic nitrate fertilizers was the primary catalyst for the dramatic increase in agricultural yields across Northern Europe. However, recent archival evidence indicates that the widespread implementation of tile drainage systems preceded the mass commercial availability of synthetic nitrates by nearly two decades. Because crop roots cannot absorb soil nutrients effectively in waterlogged fields, the efficiency of any added chemical fertilizer remains severely constrained without prior soil drainage. Therefore, the introduction of synthetic fertilizers merely amplified a productivity trend that was already well underway due to soil infrastructure improvements, rather than serving as its fundamental trigger.

In the argument above, what are the roles played by the two boldfaced portions?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The first is factual evidence presented to undermine an established position; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.

Answer

The first boldface portion is factual evidence presented to undermine an established position, and the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
The argument opens by citing a long-held view among historians that synthetic nitrates caused the yield surge. The first bold statement introduces historical evidence about tile drainage that directly undermines this traditional view. Following an explanatory premise, the second bold statement is introduced by the conclusion indicator 'Therefore', asserting the author's central point: synthetic fertilizers merely amplified a trend already started by drainage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main argument components and structural pivots
The opening sentence establishes an opposing position held by historians (synthetic nitrates were the primary catalyst). The pivot word 'However' introduces a counter-finding.
Understanding the transition reveals whether the subsequent statements support or oppose the initial view.
2
Analyze the function of the first boldface statement
The statement presents archival evidence that tile drainage preceded synthetic nitrates by two decades.
This empirical evidence contradicts the historians' timeline and supports the author's critique of the traditional view.
3
Analyze the bridge premise and the second boldface statement
The author explains why drainage matters (fertilizer efficiency relies on drainage) and concludes with 'Therefore...', leading directly to the second boldface statement.
The conclusion word 'Therefore' explicitly signals that the second bold statement is the ultimate claim the author is defending.

Key Concept

Analyzing Boldface Roles in Critical Reasoning Arguments
Page 1 / 9Next
Critical Reasoning: Argument Evaluation Practice Questions — GMAT | Examkin