Question

Difficulty: MediumAnalyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles

Marine biologists once theorized that the sudden proliferation of deep-sea glass sponge reefs off the Pacific coast was primarily driven by recent changes in ocean water temperature. However, this hypothesis overlooks crucial historical sedimentation data. High-resolution oceanographic core samples demonstrate that these sponge colonies have maintained stable growth cycles for over three millennia, regardless of thermal fluctuations. Because glass sponge structures rely on dissolved silica rather than temperature stability to construct their structural frameworks, the recent expansion is actually attributable to agricultural runoff that boosted coastal silica concentrations.

Which of the following statements accurately describe the structural function of the boldfaced portions in the argument above? Select all that apply.

  1. The first boldfaced portion presents a hypothesis that the argument seeks to refute.Answer
  2. The second boldfaced portion states the main conclusion that the overall argument advocates.Answer
  3. C
    The first boldfaced portion provides factual evidence that directly supports the author's main conclusion.
  4. D
    The second boldfaced portion is a intermediate premise used to show that glass sponges are indifferent to ocean silica levels.
  5. E
    The first boldfaced portion is an unstated assumption required for the silica runoff explanation to hold true.

Answer

The correct selections are the statement identifying the first boldfaced portion as a hypothesis the argument seeks to refute, and the statement identifying the second boldfaced portion as the main conclusion advocated by the argument.
The passage begins by presenting a prior theory regarding temperature changes, which the author proceeds to undermine using oceanographic data. Thus, the statement describing the first boldfaced portion as a hypothesis the argument seeks to refute is accurate. The author then presents evidence about glass sponge silicious reliance to conclude that agricultural silica runoff explains the reef expansion; thus, the statement describing the second boldfaced portion as the main conclusion advocated by the argument is also accurate.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the main argument flow and identify the role of the first boldfaced segment.
The text states 'Marine biologists once theorized that...', followed by 'However, this hypothesis overlooks...'. Thus, the first boldface portion is an opposing claim/hypothesis being challenged by the author.
The contrast transition 'However' signals that the author disagrees with the initial temperature theory.
2
Analyze the evidence provided and the role of the second boldfaced segment.
The argument uses evidence about core samples and sponge biology to lead up to 'is actually attributable to...'. Thus, the second boldface portion is the author's primary conclusion.
The structural signal 'is actually attributable to' marks the ultimate explanatory claim the author presents.
3
Evaluate the choices against the identified structural roles.
The options accurately describing the first segment as a refuted hypothesis and the second segment as the main conclusion are correct.
They precisely mirror the rhetorical functions identified in steps 1 and 2.

Key Concept

Analyzing Argument Structure and Boldface Roles
Rate this question