Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardDeconstructing Prompt Claims & Underlying Assumptions

Consider the following GRE Issue prompt claim:

"To foster true innovation in scientific research, government funding bodies should allocate financial resources exclusively to unconstrained, curiosity-driven inquiry rather than targeted, application-oriented projects."

An essay writer aims to deconstruct this prompt by identifying its primary unstated assumption to form a critical foundation for their thesis. Which of the following best identifies the essential unstated assumption that underlies the prompt's central recommendation?

  1. Targeted, application-oriented projects rely entirely on existing scientific paradigms and are inherently incapable of yielding foundational breakthroughs that redefine a field.Answer
  2. B
    Government funding bodies possess the objective institutional competency required to accurately distinguish pure curiosity-driven proposals from application-oriented proposals.
  3. C
    Private industry investment will automatically expand to fully cover all necessary funding for targeted, application-oriented research if public funding is withdrawn.
  4. D
    Curiosity-driven research always produces measurable technological advancements more rapidly than research constrained by specific commercial or practical goals.
  5. E
    Public policy decisions regarding scientific grants are consistently distorted by political interests whenever research goals are tied to specific applied outcomes.

Answer

The essential unstated assumption is that targeted, application-oriented projects rely entirely on existing paradigms and are inherently incapable of yielding foundational breakthroughs that redefine a field.
The prompt advocates an absolute policy rule: funding must go exclusively to curiosity-driven research in order to foster true innovation. For this recommendation to hold logically, one must assume that application-oriented research is fundamentally incapable of producing true innovation. If applied research could lead to fundamental breakthroughs, the prompt's recommendation for total exclusivity would crumble. Therefore, identifying that targeted research is assumed to be incapable of foundational breakthroughs directly uncovers the prompt's central unstated premise.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt's core claim and recommendation structure.
The prompt claims that fostering 'true innovation' requires exclusive funding for 'curiosity-driven inquiry' over 'application-oriented projects.'
Deconstructing an Issue prompt requires isolating the prescriptive assertion and its scope.
2
Identify the logical bridge required to justify the absolute exclusion of applied research.
To justify excluding application-oriented research completely in pursuit of true innovation, the arguer must assume that application-oriented research contributes zero or negligible true innovation.
If applied research could also produce true innovation, exclusive funding of curiosity-driven research would not be logically necessary.
3
Evaluate the option choices to select the statement representing this fundamental presupposition.
The statement asserting that application-oriented projects are inherently incapable of yielding foundational breakthroughs directly exposes this underlying premise.
Exposing this hidden assumption provides the essay writer with the strongest leverage to construct a nuanced counterargument.

Key Concept

Deconstructing Issue Prompts via Underlying Assumptions
Rate this question

Topics

Deconstructing Prompt Claims & Underlying Assumptions

More questions from this topic