Passage:
In 1891, Dutch paleoanthropologist Eugène Dubois uncovered a fossilized skullcap along the Solo River at Trinil in East Java, designating the specimen Pithecanthropus erectus. Unlike contemporary evolutionists who searched exclusively for intermediate hominin forms in Europe, Dubois conducted excavations in the Dutch East Indies based on Ernst Haeckel's hypothesis that humans originated in the Asian tropics. Dubois's excavations yielded a femur in 1892 from the same stratigraphic layer, possessing a straight shaft indicating obligate bipedalism. Although Dubois argued that the cranial capacity—approximately 900 cubic centimeters—and the bipedal femur proved Pithecanthropus was an intermediate link between apes and humans, prominent anatomist Rudolf Virchow rejected this synthesis. Virchow contended that the skullcap belonged to an extinct giant gibbon and the femur to a modern human, asserting that the spatial separation of 15 meters between the findspots rendered their association biologically invalid. Subsequent radiometric dating confirmed the Trinil fauna to be approximately 700,000 to one million years old, establishing the remains as the first recovered fossils of Homo erectus.
According to the passage, Rudolf Virchow rejected Eugène Dubois's assertion that the excavated fossils represented a single intermediate organism primarily because
- the physical distance between the recovery sites of the skullcap and the femur indicated they belonged to different organismsAnswer
- Bthe measured cranial capacity of 900 cubic centimeters was inconsistent with obligate bipedal locomotion
- Cradiometric dating methods employed at the Trinil site failed to establish a definitive geological timeframe
- DDubois relied on Ernst Haeckel's speculative hypothesis rather than European paleontological methodology
- Ethe straight shaft of the excavated femur was characteristic of extinct arboreal primates rather than hominins