Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying Conclusions and Main Claims

While marine biologists traditionally attributed coral bleaching exclusively to acute thermal stress, recent longitudinal studies of Pacific barrier reefs suggest a more complex dynamic. Resilient coral colonies facing elevated sea temperatures do not merely retain their existing algal endosymbionts; rather, they actively shuffle their internal clade composition, favoring stress-tolerant Symbiodiniaceae strains over high-growth variants. However, this physiological adaptation comes at a measurable metabolic cost, as stress-tolerant symbionts transfer significantly fewer photosynthetically derived carbohydrates to the host organism, thereby constraining long-term skeletal calcification. Consequently, thermal adaptation strategies that focus solely on symbiont diversity overestimate long-term reef viability if calcification deficits remain unaddressed. Therefore, effective marine conservation interventions must prioritize mitigating local water pollution that compounds calcification stress alongside global climate initiatives.

Which of the following statements represent main conclusions or primary claims advocated by the author of the passage? Select all that apply.

  1. Evaluations of long-term coral reef survival that focus strictly on symbiont diversification are overly optimistic if calcification declines are ignored.Answer
  2. Comprehensive marine protection efforts must address localized environmental stressors in conjunction with broader climate change initiatives.Answer
  3. C
    Pacific coral colonies adapt to rising ocean temperatures primarily by shifting their internal clade composition toward stress-tolerant algal endosymbionts.
  4. D
    Stress-tolerant algal endosymbiont strains will eventually adapt to supply corals with adequate carbohydrates for unimpeded skeletal growth.
  5. E
    Marine conservationists should abandon global climate mitigation programs to focus exclusively on local water pollution controls.

Answer

The main conclusions advocated by the author are that focusing solely on symbiont diversity overestimates reef viability if calcification deficits are ignored, and that effective marine protection must address local water pollution alongside global climate initiatives.
The correct options accurately state the author's primary conclusions. The claim highlighting that relying solely on symbiont diversity overrates long-term viability directly restates the author's major deduction introduced by 'Consequently'. The claim asserting that local pollution controls must accompany global climate initiatives restates the author's final normative recommendation introduced by 'Therefore'.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage structure and identify structural transition markers.
The passage moves from background premise (coral clade shuffling) to a trade-off (reduced carbohydrate transfer and calcification constraints), followed by two main conclusion markers ('Consequently' and 'Therefore').
Structural indicators like 'Consequently' and 'Therefore' signal the author's primary deductions and normative claims.
2
Evaluate candidate main claims against the identified structural conclusions.
The statement regarding the overestimation of reef viability when calcification is ignored aligns with the 'Consequently' claim, and the statement calling for joint local and global intervention aligns with the 'Therefore' claim.
A main conclusion must represent the overarching thesis or primary takeaway rather than underlying supporting evidence.
3
Differentiate supporting premises and distorted scope choices from author conclusions.
The statement describing how corals shift clade composition is an empirical premise used as support, while the statements suggesting future adaptation of symbionts or abandoning global climate efforts distort the text or extrapolate beyond evidence.
Distractors often present true premises mistaken for conclusions or exaggerate the author's stance.

Key Concept

Identifying Conclusions and Main Claims
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question