Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyResolving Paradoxes and Discrepancies

In 2023, a regional public health agency launched a free municipal exercise program aimed at reducing overall rates of physical injury among senior citizens. By the end of the year, official data showed that seniors who regularly participated in the program experienced a significantly lower rate of home fall injuries compared to non-participants. Surprisingly, however, total emergency room visits for injuries among participating seniors increased by 15 percent over the same period.

Which of the following statements, if true, help to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above? Select all that apply.

  1. Participating seniors became far more physically active outdoors and in community centers, leading to an increase in minor sports-related injuries that required emergency evaluation.Answer
  2. B
    The public health agency spent more funding on promoting the exercise program than it did on any other senior health initiative that year.
  3. C
    Non-participating seniors reported a higher rate of chronic illness visits to primary care doctors than participating seniors did.
  4. D
    Emergency room treatment costs across the region rose faster than the general rate of inflation during 2023.
  5. The exercise program included mandatory medical screenings that prompted instructors to send participants to the emergency room for minor bumps that seniors previously would have ignored.Answer

Answer

The apparent paradox is resolved by statements showing that participating seniors engaged in new outdoor physical activities leading to non-home injuries, and that mandatory health screenings increased the likelihood of emergency room referrals for minor injuries.
Both correct statements introduce new factors that reconcile the two trends without denying either one. Increased outdoor sports activities explain how non-home injuries could increase emergency visits while home falls dropped. Additionally, mandatory instructor screenings explain why minor injuries resulted in emergency room visits more frequently than before.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the two contradictory facts in the passage.
Fact 1: Home fall injury rates decreased for program participants. Fact 2: Overall emergency room visits for injuries increased for program participants.
Resolving a discrepancy requires finding explanations that allow both facts to be simultaneously true.
2
Evaluate the option regarding outdoor physical activity.
If seniors engaged in more outdoor sports, they could experience non-fall injuries elsewhere, raising total emergency room visits while home falls dropped.
This accounts for the increase in total injuries outside the home context.
3
Evaluate the option regarding mandatory medical screenings.
If instructors referred minor incidents to the emergency room that were previously ignored, the total count of official emergency visits would naturally rise.
This explains a change in reporting/seeking emergency care without contradicting the reduced home fall rate.

Key Concept

Resolving Paradoxes and Discrepancies
Rate this question

Topics

Resolving Paradoxes and Discrepancies

More questions from this topic