Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumMain Idea and Primary Purpose

In the late nineteenth century, evolutionary biologists enthusiastically adopted Ernst Haeckel’s biogenetic law, which asserted that an embryo’s developmental stages recapitulate the adult evolutionary forms of its ancestors. However, this recapitulationist consensus glossed over the earlier, more nuanced embryological principles formulated by Karl Ernst von Baer in 1828. Von Baer argued that development proceeds from general, clade-wide characteristics to increasingly specialized species traits, explicitly denying that higher animals pass through the adult states of lower organisms. Recent historiography has reexamined this intellectual divergence, highlighting how Haeckel’s compelling linear narrative temporarily eclipsed von Baer’s branching framework. Far from being a mere precursor to Haeckel, von Baer offered a non-teleological model of differentiation that anticipated modern evolutionary developmental biology far more accurately than Haeckel’s rigid recapitulationism. Historians now argue that the long-standing emphasis on Haeckel obscured von Baer’s crucial insight: embryonic development reflects ancestral embryonic patterns, not adult evolutionary stages.

Which of the following best states the primary purpose of the passage?

  1. Reevaluate the historical significance of von Baer’s embryological framework relative to Haeckel’s recapitulation theory.Answer
  2. B
    Detail the specific cellular mechanisms by which embryonic traits differentiate into species-specific features.
  3. C
    Argue that Haeckel intentionally falsified embryological data to gain widespread acceptance for his biogenetic law.
  4. D
    Trace the historical development of modern evolutionary developmental biology from antiquity to the contemporary era.
  5. E
    Condemn nineteenth-century biologists for systematically suppressing non-teleological theories of animal development.

Answer

The primary purpose of the passage is to reevaluate the historical significance of von Baer’s embryological framework relative to Haeckel’s recapitulation theory.
The passage discusses how recent historiography has reexamined nineteenth-century embryology, arguing that von Baer's non-teleological model anticipated modern developmental biology more accurately than Haeckel's biogenetic law. Thus, the text's primary purpose is to reevaluate von Baer's contribution in relation to Haeckel's.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage structure and main thesis
The passage opens by noting the long dominance of Haeckel's biogenetic law, introduces von Baer's opposing 1828 principles, and explains how modern historians are restoring von Baer's reputation as a more accurate forebear of modern biology.
Primary purpose questions require identifying the main goal of the text as a whole.
2
Synthesize the author's primary objective
The author aims to highlight modern historiography that elevates von Baer's branching, non-teleological model over Haeckel's linear recapitulationism.
The thesis centers on reassessing von Baer's historical role relative to Haeckel.
3
Evaluate option choices against the identified objective
The option stating to reevaluate the historical significance of von Baer's framework accurately summarizes this central objective without overstating tone or distorting scope.
Distractors suffer from scope errors, overstatement of tone, or unsupported inferences.

Key Concept

Identifying the central claim and overarching objective of an academic passage.
Rate this question

Topics

Main Idea and Primary Purpose

More questions from this topic