Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumIntegrating Specific Concrete Evidence

Match each abstract argument premise on the left with the specific, concrete empirical evidence on the right that most effectively substantiates it.

  • Implementing municipal bike-share programs significantly reduces urban traffic congestion and localized carbon emissions.A 2023 Department of Transportation study in City X documented a 14% decrease in downtown rush-hour traffic volume and a 9% drop in CO2 levels following the launch of 5,000 public bicycles.
  • Mandating holistic admissions reviews in higher education improves student retention without compromising academic standards.Data from State University's five-year tracking cohort revealed a 12% increase in six-year graduation rates and stable average GPAs after replacing test score minimums with portfolio evaluations.
  • Transitioning to a hybrid remote-work policy boosts employee productivity while lowering corporate overhead operational expenses.A multi-firm audit of 45 technology sector organizations reported a 15% increase in weekly project completion rates alongside a $1.2 million annual reduction in real estate costs per 1,000 employees.
  • Expanding urban green spaces improves public health outcomes and mitigates local heat-island effects in metropolitan areas.Satellite thermal imaging and public health records in Metropolitan Area Y demonstrated a 2.5°C reduction in peak summer ambient temperatures and an 18% decline in heat-related emergency room visits near new parklands.

Answer

Each abstract premise is correctly matched with concrete empirical evidence that presents specific, verifiable quantitative metrics directly supporting the claim's scope and mechanisms.
Each abstract argument premise is accurately paired with empirical evidence that provides measurable data—such as study percentages, specific temperature changes, financial audit results, and graduation metrics—directly confirming the claim's assertion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze each abstract premise on the left to identify the core cause-and-effect relationship being claimed.
Identified four distinct subject areas: municipal transit/emissions, university admissions/retention, remote work productivity/overhead, and urban green spaces/public health.
Clear identification of the premise variables is necessary to select evidence with matching contextual scope.
2
Evaluate the evidence statements on the right for specific, measurable empirical data rather than general assertions.
Selected evidence items containing explicit numerical metrics, named institutional data sources, and verified outcome measures.
Concrete evidence in Analytical Writing requires specific data, real-world case details, or study metrics to replace unsupported generalizations.
3
Align each premise with the specific evidence item that directly addresses both its primary cause and stated effect.
Paired each abstract claim with its exact empirical counterpart based on metric alignment.
Ensures full conceptual relevance and logical sufficiency between premise and supporting evidence.

Key Concept

Integrating Specific Concrete Evidence in Argumentation
Rate this question

Topics

Integrating Specific Concrete Evidence

More questions from this topic