Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumMulti-Blank Dependency Tracking

Which terms correctly fill in each blank in the passage below to complete the text in a logically coherent manner?

Answer:Far from proving that the newly unearthed tablet was an ancient forgery, the presence of anomalous grammatical constructions actually served to 【substantiate】 its authenticity; because such idiosyncratic syntax could not have been devised by a modern hoaxer lacking knowledge of the regional dialect's archaic evolution, the linguistic irregularities were eventually recognized as 【compelling】 evidence of the artifact's genuine antiquity.

Answer

Blank 1 requires a verb meaning to confirm or validate (such as 'substantiate' or 'corroborate'), and Blank 2 requires an adjective meaning decisive or irrefutable (such as 'compelling' or 'conclusive').
The structural pivot 'Far from proving... a forgery' establishes a reversal, indicating that the grammatical anomalies served to validate or substantiate authenticity rather than disprove it. Subsequently, the causal explanation that a hoaxer could not have known such archaic syntax dictates that these features provided compelling or decisive evidence of genuine antiquity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the contrast clue in the first clause.
The opening structural shift 'Far from proving that... was an ancient forgery' indicates that the presence of anomalous grammatical constructions supported, rather than undermined, the tablet's genuineness.
The structural pivot 'far from' reverses the negative expectation associated with a forgery, requiring Blank 1 to express confirmation or validation.
2
Analyze the causal clue for the second blank.
The second clause explains that a modern hoaxer could not have devised such archaic syntax, demonstrating that the irregularities provided convincing and definitive proof.
The inability of a counterfeiter to know the archaic dialect establishes that the evidence is decisive, compelling, or conclusive for Blank 2.
3
Track inter-blank dependency to ensure semantic alignment.
Both blanks work in tandem: confirming authenticity in the first slot logically aligns with treating the linguistic evidence as decisive proof in the second slot.
Choosing a term meaning to discredit for the first blank would directly contradict the positive assertion made in the second clause, disrupting cross-blank coherence.

Key Concept

Multi-Blank Dependency Tracking
Rate this question

Topics

Multi-Blank Dependency Tracking

More questions from this topic