Read the passage below. Identify the sentence that functions primarily to present specific historical evidence supporting a revisionist perspective. Enter the sentence identifier (e.g., Sentence 4) into the blank.
Answer:[Sentence 1] For much of the twentieth century, legal historians analyzed the sixteenth-century codification of French customary law primarily as a top-down instrument of royal centralization designed to suppress municipal autonomy. [Sentence 2] Under this prevailing framework, royal commissioners sent to redact local customs were viewed as agents of autocratic uniformity who systematically excised regional legal idiosyncrasies. [Sentence 3] However, recent archival examinations of provincial drafting records reveal that municipal magistrates frequently co-opted the redaction process, inserting traditional local privileges under the guise of procedural standardization. [Sentence 4] To substantiate this revisionist perspective, historians cite the 1539 codification in Auvergne, where local delegates successfully enshrined agrarian tenant protections that directly contradicted royal edicts favoring seigneurial landholders. [Sentence 5] Consequently, the codification movement can no longer be interpreted as a unilinear triumph of monarchical authority over regional tradition. [Sentence 6] Rather, it represented a dynamic institutional compromise in which local elites redefined their legal standing within the expanding apparatus of the early modern state.
Target Sentence: 【Sentence 4】
Target Sentence: 【Sentence 4】
Answer
Sentence 4
Sentence 4 is the correct choice because it explicitly serves to ground the revisionist thesis introduced in Sentence 3 by offering a specific historical case study: the 1539 codification in Auvergne, where local delegates successfully passed tenant protections opposing royal edicts.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Rhetorical Structure and Sentence Function