Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardFormulating a Nuanced Thesis Statement

Consider the following GRE Issue prompt and specific instruction:

Prompt: "Governments should place greater emphasis on preserving historical landmarks than on funding contemporary arts projects."

Instruction: "Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position."

Which of the following thesis statements effectively articulate a nuanced position that satisfies both the prompt and its specific instruction? Select all that apply.

  1. While preserving historical landmarks is essential for maintaining cultural heritage, governments should prioritize contemporary arts funding in urban centers where creative innovation drives necessary economic revitalization.Answer
  2. B
    Governments must unconditionally dedicate all cultural funding to historical preservation, as contemporary arts offer no tangible educational or social value to society.
  3. Although safeguarding historical landmarks offers irreplaceable civic value, public funding should shift toward contemporary arts in communities where emerging cultural expressions foster social inclusivity and local employment.Answer
  4. D
    Whether governments should focus more on historical landmarks or contemporary arts depends on various factors that policymakers must carefully evaluate in different situations.
  5. E
    Governments should allocate resources exclusively to contemporary arts because modern artists reflect current societal values far better than centuries-old monuments ever can.

Answer

The effective thesis statements are those that acknowledge the value of historical preservation while specifying concrete, context-dependent circumstances under which funding contemporary arts becomes equally or more advantageous.
A strong GRE Issue thesis statement must take a clear stance while qualifying its main claim in response to the specific prompt instruction. The statement prioritizing contemporary arts in urban centers facing economic revitalization and the statement directing funding toward contemporary arts in communities needing social inclusivity both successfully define precise contextual boundaries. They acknowledge the concession (the value of historical preservation) while establishing clear conditions under which contemporary arts funding is more advantageous.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the prompt instruction type
Identified the condition: must evaluate the extent of agreement/disagreement and describe specific circumstances where the recommendation is or is not advantageous.
GRE Analytical Writing prompts require thesis statements to conform directly to the specified task instruction.
2
Evaluate candidate thesis statements for nuance and qualifications
Selected statements that establish a clear primary position, acknowledge counter-considerations (concessions), and define explicit boundary conditions.
A high-scoring GRE Issue thesis must avoid absolutism and vague restatements while demonstrating complex, multi-perspective reasoning.
3
Eliminate flawed distractors
Rejected options exhibiting absolutist claims, vague restatements, or completely one-sided dismissals.
Absolutist or restated positions fail to fulfill the 'extent' and 'circumstances' requirements of the instruction.

Key Concept

Formulating a Nuanced Thesis Statement
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Formulating a Nuanced Thesis Statement

More questions from this topic