In his 1890 treatise on comparative philology, historian Julian Thorne reexamined the formalization of sound laws in historical linguistics. Mid-nineteenth-century scholars often viewed language shifts as arbitrary historical accidents, whereas later Neogrammarians insisted that phonetic change operated with absolute, exceptionless necessity. Thorne contends that in their eagerness to establish linguistics as a rigorous science, these theorists put the cart before the horse by treating abstract, retrospective regularities as the primary engine driving speech transformation. In Thorne’s estimation, the codified sound laws were merely descriptive summaries compiled from thousands of individual spoken interactions, rather than pre-existing structural imperatives that dictated how speakers altered their pronunciation over time. By mistaking the observed outcome of linguistic evolution for its initiating cause, the Neogrammarians inverted the proper relationship between living language and theoretical abstraction.
Which of the following best captures the conceptual error described by the author's use of the phrase "put the cart before the horse"?
- Reversing the logical relationship between an observed outcome and its underlying causeAnswer
- BMisinterpreting historical developments in agricultural transport technology and animal usage
- CRejecting the overall scientific validity and utility of historical linguistics as a discipline
- DAssuming that living spoken dialects will cease evolving once formal grammatical rules are codified
- EDemonstrating severe scholarly hostility toward earlier philologists who studied dialectal variation