In his 1875 paper on Germanic accentuation, linguist Karl Verner resolved a key exception to Grimm’s Law, which had established a systematic shift of Proto-Indo-European voiceless stops into Proto-Germanic voiceless fricatives. Scholars had long been puzzled by cases where Proto-Indo-European voiceless stops evolved instead into voiced fricatives or voiced stops in Germanic daughter languages. Verner demonstrated that this sound change was strictly conditioned by the position of the ancestral accent: if the preceding vowel did not carry the primary Proto-Indo-European stress, the expected voiceless fricative underwent voicing. Crucially, Verner established that this accentual conditioning occurred only after Grimm’s Law had already transformed the original voiceless stops into voiceless fricatives, rather than operating concurrently with or prior to Grimm's shift. Furthermore, Verner relied on Vedic Sanskrit accent markings to reconstruct the stress patterns of Proto-Indo-European lexical items, as Proto-Germanic itself had fixed stress on the initial syllable prior to the composition of its earliest surviving written attestations.
According to the passage, which of the following is explicitly stated regarding the timing of the accentual sound change identified by Verner?
- AIt took place prior to the operation of Grimm's Law on Proto-Indo-European voiceless stops.
- BIt operated concurrently with Grimm's Law while Proto-Germanic maintained mobile stress.
- It occurred exclusively after Grimm's Law had converted Proto-Indo-European voiceless stops into voiceless fricatives.Answer
- DIt transpired after Proto-Germanic had already fixed its accentual stress on the initial syllable.
- EIt was triggered directly by accent patterns preserved in early Proto-Germanic written attestations.