Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumWarranties, Representations, and Concealment

A freelance architect submits an application for a disability income policy. One of the medical questionnaire items asks whether the applicant has ever received treatment for asthma. The applicant checks 'No,' honestly having forgotten about a brief period of using a mild inhaler over twenty-five years ago. The insurance company approves and issues the policy. Two years later, the architect suffers a severe spinal injury in an automobile accident and files a claim for benefits. During the claims investigation process, the insurer's adjusters uncover the childhood asthma record.

Based on insurance contract law regarding applicant disclosures, what is the legal impact of this discovery on the claim?

  1. Coverage continues unaffected since the response is considered a representation, and the forgotten treatment was neither intentional nor material to the risk.Answer
  2. B
    The insurer will rescind the contract because application answers are treated as absolute warranties, meaning any factual error legally invalidates the coverage.
  3. C
    The claim process will be paused until the insurance agent unilaterally corrects the original application to include the childhood medical history.
  4. D
    The company will deny the payout because the inaccurate medical response creates a legal estoppel, which permanently transfers the risk back to the applicant.

Answer

Coverage continues unaffected since the response is considered a representation, and the forgotten treatment was neither intentional nor material to the risk.
The correct answer identifies that statements on an insurance application are representations. Because the applicant honestly forgot about a minor childhood condition, it was an innocent misrepresentation. Furthermore, a brief asthma treatment 25 years ago is not material to a spinal injury claim. Therefore, the policy cannot be voided, and the claim must be paid.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nature of the applicant's statement.
The applicant answered 'No' to the asthma question, believing it to be true because they had forgotten about a minor incident 25 years prior.
Determining intent is necessary to classify whether this was an innocent misstatement or intentional concealment.
2
Apply the legal definitions of warranties and representations.
Statements on applications are representations (true to the applicant's best knowledge), not warranties (absolute guarantees of truth).
This distinction determines how strictly the insurer can hold the applicant to the literal truth of the statement.
3
Determine the impact of materiality on the claim.
The omitted asthma treatment from 25 years ago is immaterial to a spinal injury from a car accident, and since the misrepresentation was unintentional, the insurer cannot void the policy.
For a representation to void a policy, it generally must be both false and material to the risk being insured.

Key Concept

Representations and Materiality in Insurance Contracts
Rate this question

Topics

Warranties, Representations, and Concealment

More questions from this topic