Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumLegal Interpretations and Doctrines

A software engineer applies for a 20-year term life insurance policy. On the medical questionnaire, the applicant is asked if they have consulted a medical professional in the past three years. The applicant answers 'No,' having genuinely forgotten a brief virtual urgent care visit for a minor sinus infection two years prior. The insurer issues the policy. Fourteen months later, the insured is killed in a commercial aviation accident. During the claims review process, the insurer discovers the record of the sinus infection treatment and attempts to void the contract, claiming the applicant provided false information. Based on insurance contract law, which of the following principles legally require the insurer to pay the claim? (Select all that apply)

  1. Statements made on the application are considered representations, meaning they only need to be true to the best of the applicant's knowledge.Answer
  2. The undisclosed medical visit was not a material fact, because a minor sinus infection would not have altered the insurer's underwriting decision.Answer
  3. C
    Because the policy is a contract of adhesion, the insurer is strictly prohibited from voiding the contract for any application inaccuracies once it is issued.
  4. D
    The applicant's statements are considered absolute warranties, but the insurer waived the right to enforce them by accepting the initial premium payment.

Answer

The insurer must pay the claim because application statements are representations (not warranties) and the omitted sinus infection was not a material fact.
The insurer is required to pay the claim due to two key legal doctrines: First, application answers are legally considered representations (statements believed to be true to the best of the applicant's knowledge) rather than strict warranties. Second, for a misrepresentation to successfully void a policy, it must be material. A minor sinus infection is not material because it would not have affected the underwriting decision or premium.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the legal nature of the applicant's statements.
The applicant made an honest mistake by forgetting a minor illness. Under insurance law, application answers are legally treated as representations, not warranties.
This establishes that the policy cannot be voided simply because a statement was technically inaccurate; it must meet further legal thresholds to justify voiding the contract.
2
Evaluate the materiality of the misrepresentation.
The undisclosed condition was a minor sinus infection. This is not material because knowing about it would not have changed the insurer's decision to issue the policy or the premium charged.
Insurers can only void a policy for misrepresentations if those misstatements are material to the assumption of risk.

Key Concept

Representations and Materiality in Insurance Contracts
Rate this question

Topics

Legal Interpretations and Doctrines

More questions from this topic