A business owner applies for a commercial general liability policy. The application contains a bold clause stating, "The applicant warrants that all answers provided herein are absolute truths." The owner states on the application that the business generated 540,000. Based on established insurance legal doctrines, how will the law most likely interpret the applicant's statement regarding the revenue?
- It will be treated as a representation; because the statement was true to the best of the applicant's knowledge, the insurer cannot void the policy.Answer
- BIt will be treated as an express warranty due to the explicit clause in the application, allowing the insurer to void the policy for breach of an absolute guarantee.
- CIt will be treated as a misrepresentation, allowing the insurance producer to unilaterally amend the application with the correct revenue amount.
- DBecause the policy is a contract of adhesion, the inaccurate revenue figure will be interpreted in favor of the insurer, rendering the contract void.
Answer
It will be treated as a representation; because the statement was true to the best of the applicant's knowledge, the insurer cannot void the policy.
The correct answer accurately applies the legal principle that statements on insurance applications are representations, not warranties. Because the business owner answered truthfully to the best of their knowledge at the time, there was no concealment or material misrepresentation that would give the insurer grounds to void the contract.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Representations vs. Warranties and Statutory Overrides