Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardUnfair Claims Settlement Practices

An auditor from the Department of Insurance is investigating a property and casualty carrier for potential statutory violations. The auditor is specifically looking for infractions related to claims handling procedures. Upon reviewing four specific claim files, the auditor flags one file for a clear regulatory infraction.

Based on the standard Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, which of the following documented procedures would be flagged as an unfair practice?

  1. Halting the processing of a commercial property claim because the policyholder did not submit a formal proof of loss form, despite the policyholder having already submitted a comprehensive preliminary report containing the identical required information.Answer
  2. B
    Issuing immediate payment for the undisputed inventory damage portion of a claim, while keeping the file open and delaying payment on the disputed business income loss portion until further documentation is received.
  3. C
    Mailing a formal notice to an insured prior to the expiration of the standard settlement timeframe, explaining that a final decision will be delayed by 30 days pending the results of an independent cause-and-origin fire investigation.
  4. D
    Issuing a prompt denial letter for a third-party bodily injury claim after the initial investigation clearly established that the policyholder was not legally liable for the claimant's injuries, without offering a nominal settlement.

Answer

The action that constitutes an unfair practice is halting the claim process to demand a formal proof of loss when the insured has already provided a preliminary report containing the identical required information.
Under the NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Model Act, it is an explicit violation to delay the investigation or payment of a claim by requiring an insured to submit both a preliminary claim report and a subsequent formal proof of loss form when both submissions contain substantially the same information. This is considered an unreasonable stalling tactic.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the purpose of the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act.
The Act is designed to protect consumers from unreasonable delays, coercive tactics, and bad faith dealing by insurers during the claims process.
Establishing the regulatory baseline helps in evaluating the legality of specific adjuster actions.
2
Evaluate the requirement for duplicate documentation.
Demanding a formal proof of loss that duplicates information already provided in a preliminary report is explicitly prohibited by the Act as an unreasonable stalling tactic.
This directly violates the statutory prohibition against delaying investigations through unnecessary, repetitive paperwork.
3
Analyze the remaining claims handling scenarios for compliance.
Paying undisputed claims promptly, issuing timely extension notices with valid reasons, and denying claims where there is no clear liability are all standard, legally compliant industry practices.
Differentiating between rigorous but legal claims handling and actual statutory violations is necessary to eliminate the distractors.

Key Concept

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Rate this question

Topics

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices

More questions from this topic