Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardUnfair Claims Settlement Practices

A homeowner suffers extensive interior water damage due to a burst pipe and promptly files a property claim. The assigned field adjuster manages the investigation and settlement process over several weeks. Under NAIC model regulations for claims handling, which of the following actions by the adjuster constitute statutory Unfair Claims Settlement Practices? (Select two)

  1. Advising the claimant against retaining independent legal counsel by implying that doing so will intentionally delay the process and result in a lower final settlement offer.Answer
  2. Neglecting to affirm or deny coverage for the water damage within a reasonable timeframe after receiving a properly executed proof of loss from the insured.Answer
  3. C
    Issuing a formal written notice that the investigation requires an additional 30 days, including a specific rationale related to evaluating hidden mold damage.
  4. D
    Proposing a settlement amount based on the actual cash value of the damaged flooring, in strict accordance with the loss settlement provisions outlined in the policy contract.

Answer

The actions constituting Unfair Claims Settlement Practices are advising the claimant against retaining legal counsel by implying it will lower the settlement, and neglecting to affirm or deny coverage within a reasonable timeframe after receiving a proof of loss.
Discouraging a claimant from seeking legal counsel and failing to promptly affirm or deny coverage after receiving a proof of loss are explicit violations under the NAIC Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act. Both actions unfairly prejudice the insured's ability to receive a fair, timely, and equitable settlement.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the action regarding legal counsel.
The adjuster used coercive language to dissuade the insured from seeking legal help.
NAIC regulations prohibit insurers from advising claimants not to obtain legal representation or using it as a threat.
2
Evaluate the timeline for affirming or denying coverage.
The adjuster failed to provide a coverage decision within a reasonable time after receiving the proof of loss.
Statutes mandate that insurers must promptly affirm or deny coverage once a properly executed proof of loss is submitted.
3
Assess the 30-day investigation extension.
The adjuster provided written notice with a specific, valid reason for the delay.
Providing a timely, written explanation for an investigation delay is a legally compliant procedure, not an unfair practice.
4
Review the settlement offer based on actual cash value.
The offer strictly adhered to the loss settlement provisions in the policy.
Enforcing valid policy provisions (like actual cash value instead of replacement cost) is standard practice and does not constitute an unfairly low settlement offer.

Key Concept

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act violations vs. compliant claims handling procedures
Rate this question

Topics

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices

More questions from this topic