Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumCompleting the Application

During a routine compliance review, an agency manager is examining a recently submitted paper application for a comprehensive disability income policy. The manager discovers that the applicant had crossed out their original salary figure and wrote in a new amount, but failed to provide their initials next to the change. Additionally, the field underwriter (producer) had written "None" in a previously blank medication history section after verbally confirming the answer with the client over the phone, aiming to expedite the submission.

Based on standard field underwriting procedures, which of the following correctly identifies the compliance violations regarding the completion of this application?

  1. The producer committed an unauthorized alteration by filling in the blank section, and the un-initialed salary correction is invalid; the document must be returned to the applicant for proper completion and initials.Answer
  2. B
    The producer acted appropriately within their implied authority by filling in the blank medication section to facilitate rapid policy issuance, but the salary correction still requires the applicant's initials.
  3. C
    Because statements on a disability application are considered strict warranties, the producer had a legal obligation to alter the blank medication question to reflect the absolute truth before submission.
  4. D
    The producer should have submitted the application with the medication question left entirely blank, because the home office underwriting department will automatically process and approve applications containing minor overlooked questions.

Answer

The producer committed an unauthorized alteration by filling in the blank section, and the un-initialed salary correction is invalid; the document must be returned to the applicant for proper completion and initials.
An insurance application is a legal document that forms the basis of the insurance contract. Consequently, any changes or corrections to the application must be struck through, corrected, and visibly initialed by the applicant themselves to prove consent. Furthermore, a producer never has the authority to unilaterally alter an application or fill in blank questions, even if they have verbally confirmed the correct information with the client over the phone. The only legally compliant action when an application is incomplete or improperly corrected is to return the document to the applicant for their initials and physical completion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the first issue: the un-initialed salary correction.
Any change made to an application must be initialed by the applicant to verify they made or approved the change. Without initials, the correction is procedurally invalid.
To prevent fraudulent alterations and ensure the contract is based on the applicant's true statements.
2
Analyze the second issue: the producer filling in the blank medication question.
The producer wrote 'None' on the application based on a verbal phone call. This constitutes an unauthorized alteration of a legal document.
The application is the applicant's formal declaration. Producers are not permitted to add, alter, or erase answers on the application.
3
Determine the required corrective action.
The application must be returned to the applicant so they can physically initial the salary change and fill in the missing medication information themselves.
This is the only legally compliant way to cure defects in an incomplete or improperly altered application.

Key Concept

Application Alterations and Signatures
Rate this question

Topics

Completing the Application

More questions from this topic