Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardUnfair Claims Settlement Practices

A commercial policyholder files a complex casualty claim on October 1st. The insurer, Sentinel Standard, takes the following sequential actions:

• October 12: Acknowledges the initial claim and issues a blank proof of loss form.
• November 2: Receives the sworn and completed proof of loss from the insured.
• November 25: Sends written notice that the investigation remains ongoing due to conflicting witness statements, requiring an additional 30-day extension.
• December 15: Concludes the investigation, establishing that liability for the property damage is reasonably clear, but the business interruption loss remains disputed.
• December 18: Offers to pay the property damage claim immediately, provided the insured agrees to withdraw the business interruption claim.

Based on the NAIC Model Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, which of the insurer's actions constitutes a statutory violation?

  1. Offering to settle the clear property damage claim only on the condition that the insured drops the disputed business interruption claimAnswer
  2. B
    Waiting until November 25th—23 days after receiving the completed proof of loss—to notify the insured of the need for an investigation extension
  3. C
    Delaying the acknowledgment of the initial claim communication and the issuance of claim forms until October 12th
  4. D
    Utilizing a formal 30-day investigation extension to resolve discrepancies between conflicting witness statements

Answer

Offering to settle the clear property damage claim only on the condition that the insured drops the disputed business interruption claim
The correct answer accurately identifies that an insurer cannot use an undisputed portion of a claim (property damage) as leverage to force an insured into dropping or settling a disputed portion (business interruption). The NAIC Model Act explicitly lists this tactic as an Unfair Claims Settlement Practice, as insurers have a duty to promptly pay claims where liability has become reasonably clear.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the timeline for the claim acknowledgment and provision of forms.
The insurer took 11 days (October 1 to October 12), which is within the standard 15-day statutory requirement.
To rule out administrative delays as the unfair practice.
2
Evaluate the timeline and justification for the investigation extension.
The extension was requested 23 days after receiving the proof of loss (within the typical 30-day limit) and was justified by conflicting witness statements.
To determine if the insurer failed to implement reasonable standards for prompt investigation or improperly delayed the claim.
3
Analyze the settlement offer made on December 18.
The insurer leveraged an undisputed portion of the claim (property damage) to force a settlement on a disputed portion (business interruption).
To identify if the negotiation tactics violate fair settlement mandates.
4
Compare the identified negotiation tactic against the NAIC Model Act provisions.
Leveraging one coverage against another is explicitly defined as an Unfair Claims Settlement Practice.
To conclusively identify the statutory violation among the actions taken.

Key Concept

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices
Rate this question

Topics

Unfair Claims Settlement Practices

More questions from this topic