On March 12th, Samantha applies for a $1,500,000 key-person life insurance policy. She provides a corporate check for the initial annual premium, and the producer issues a standard conditional insurability receipt. Samantha completes her required medical exam on March 15th, and the clinical results clearly qualify her for preferred risk status.
On March 19th, the insurer's accounting department receives official notification from the bank that the corporate check was returned for non-sufficient funds (NSF).
On March 20th, before the insurer can formally notify her of the bounced check, Samantha is fatally injured in an automobile collision. The designated beneficiary immediately contacts the producer, offering to wire the premium funds or provide a certified cashier's check to secure the coverage.
Based on the legal principles of insurance contracts and premium receipts, which TWO of the following statements are accurate regarding this situation? (Select two)
- The conditional receipt was rendered null and void because a dishonored check constitutes a total failure of the applicant's legal consideration.Answer
- No temporary or permanent coverage ever went into effect because the successful clearing of the initial premium is an absolute prerequisite under a conditional receipt.Answer
- CThe insurer must pay the claim because Samantha's proven insurability as of March 15th irrevocably triggered the conditional receipt's retroactive coverage clause.
- DThe act of relinquishing the physical check on March 12th fully satisfied the requirement for consideration, legally shifting the financial collection risk to the insurer.
- EThe producer possesses the implied authority to accept the beneficiary's certified check post-mortem to retroactively cure the premium deficiency and bind the insurer.