A commercial jewelry wholesaler files a substantial theft claim under their block policy. The insurer's assigned adjuster acknowledges receipt of the notice of claim within 5 days and promptly provides the required claim forms. The insured returns a fully executed and sworn proof of loss on October 1st. Because the circumstances of the theft are highly suspicious, the insurer refers the file to its Special Investigative Unit (SIU). By November 10th, the investigation remains active and unresolved. To avoid jeopardizing the ongoing fraud probe, the adjuster intentionally withholds any status updates from the insured. Under NAIC model regulations, which specific unfair claims settlement practice has the insurer committed in this scenario?
- ARefusing to pay a claim without conducting a reasonable and objective investigation based on all available information.
- Failing to notify the insured that additional time is needed to investigate the claim within the mandated timeframe after receiving the proof of loss.Answer
- CFailing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon initial communications with respect to claims arising under the policy.
- DDelaying the investigation by requiring the insured to submit preliminary claim reports followed by formal documents containing identical information.
Answer
Failing to notify the insured that additional time is needed to investigate the claim within the mandated timeframe after receiving the proof of loss.
Under NAIC model regulations, an insurer must either affirm or deny a claim, or formally notify the insured that additional time is needed to investigate, within a specific statutory timeframe (typically 30 days) after receiving a properly executed proof of loss. Suspecting fraud and referring a file to a Special Investigative Unit does not exempt the insurer from this strict communication requirement.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Procedural Communication Timelines in Claims Handling