Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardSources of Underwriting Information

To evaluate a $2 million term life insurance submission, an underwriting department orders several standard reports. The applicant's signed medical questionnaire denies any history of cardiovascular disease. However, the Medical Information Bureau (MIB) database flags the applicant with a code indicating recent treatment for chronic hypertension. Furthermore, an Investigative Consumer Report reveals that the applicant regularly participates in extreme rock climbing, a material detail not disclosed on the application.

Which of the following represents the legally compliant procedure if the insurer intends to offer coverage at a higher, substandard premium rate due to these findings?

  1. A
    The insurer may apply the substandard rating using the MIB code as the primary medical justification, provided the applicant is given an adverse action notice that includes the contact information for both the MIB and the investigative reporting agency.
  2. B
    The underwriter must pause the evaluation and authorize the producer to unilaterally correct the medical and hobby sections of the application to match the external reports before finalizing the premium rating.
  3. The insurer must independently verify the hypertension, such as by requesting an Attending Physician's Statement, and must issue a Fair Credit Reporting Act adverse action notice containing the contact information of the investigative reporting agency.Answer
  4. D
    Since the applicant's answers on the application are considered absolute warranties, the insurer is legally permitted to decline the coverage based on the omissions without requesting further medical records or providing consumer notifications.

Answer

The insurer must independently verify the hypertension, such as by requesting an Attending Physician's Statement, and must issue a Fair Credit Reporting Act adverse action notice containing the contact information of the investigative reporting agency.
The correct response accurately synthesizes multiple underwriting regulations. First, it respects the MIB's core rule: underwriters must use MIB data merely as an alert and must independently confirm the medical history (e.g., via an Attending Physician's Statement) before taking adverse action. Second, it correctly applies the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which mandates that if an applicant is offered a policy at a higher premium (an adverse action) based on information in an Investigative Consumer Report, they must receive a notice that includes the reporting agency's contact details.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the MIB findings and the rules governing MIB usage.
The insurer cannot use the MIB code as the sole justification for the substandard rating; the medical condition must be independently verified.
Industry regulations stipulate that MIB reports are designed to alert underwriters to potential fraud or omissions, but independently verified evidence (like an Attending Physician's Statement) is required to take adverse action.
2
Evaluate the FCRA requirements triggered by the Investigative Consumer Report.
An adverse action notice must be provided to the applicant.
Applying a substandard rating constitutes an 'adverse action' under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. When this action is based on a consumer report, the insurer must notify the applicant and provide the name and address of the reporting agency.
3
Assess the legal nature of the application and the producer's authority.
Application statements are representations, not warranties, and agents cannot unilaterally change the application.
This rules out the possibility of automatically voiding the contract based on a breach of warranty, and prevents the agent from simply fixing the paperwork without the applicant's involvement.

Key Concept

Integration of MIB Rules, FCRA Adverse Action Compliance, and Contract Law in Underwriting
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Sources of Underwriting Information

More questions from this topic