Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardProducer Authority and Agency Law

Global Indemnity Insurance expressly restricts its appointed producer, Elena, from binding commercial liability policies with limits exceeding 500,000withoutpriorunderwritingapproval.However,GlobalIndemnityprovidesElenawithpre−printedcompanybinderformsthatdonotstatethislimitation.Elenameetswithanewcommercialclient,issuesa500,000 without prior underwriting approval. However, Global Indemnity provides Elena with pre-printed company binder forms that do not state this limitation. Elena meets with a new commercial client, issues a 1,000,000 binder on the spot using the company forms, and collects the initial premium. Two days later, before the home office receives the application, the client suffers an $800,000 loss. Global Indemnity attempts to deny the claim, arguing Elena exceeded her contract terms.

Based on the principles of agency law, which of the following best describes the legal outcome of this scenario?

  1. A
    Global Indemnity can deny the claim entirely because Elena explicitly violated her express authority, which immediately voids any implied authority she held.
  2. B
    Global Indemnity is legally required to pay only $500,000 of the claim, because the doctrine of waiver applies to the authorized portion of the coverage.
  3. Global Indemnity is bound to cover the loss because providing Elena with unrestricted company forms created apparent authority, upon which the client reasonably relied.Answer
  4. D
    Global Indemnity can deny the claim because a producer's unilateral alteration of underwriting limits without the client's initials on the application is legally void.

Answer

Global Indemnity is bound to cover the loss because providing Elena with unrestricted company forms created apparent authority, upon which the client reasonably relied.
The correct answer accurately applies the doctrine of apparent authority. Apparent authority is what the public reasonably believes the agent possesses based on the actions of the principal. By giving Elena unrestricted binder forms, Global Indemnity created the appearance that she had the authority to issue them for any amount. Because the client reasonably relied on this appearance, the insurer is legally bound by Elena's actions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the type of authority the producer was acting under when issuing the binder.
Elena lacked express or implied authority to bind a $1,000,000 policy, but she possessed apparent authority because the insurer provided her with unrestricted binder forms.
Agency law categorizes authority into express, implied, and apparent. Determining which applies is necessary to establish liability.
2
Determine if the client's reliance on the producer's authority was reasonable.
The client reasonably relied on the pre-printed company forms provided by Elena, entirely unaware of her internal $500,000 binding limitation.
Apparent authority only binds the principal if the third party has a reasonable belief in the agent's authority based on the principal's actions.
3
Apply the principle of apparent authority to the claim outcome.
Because the insurer created the apparent authority by supplying the forms, the insurer is legally bound by Elena's actions and must honor the 1,000,000binder,requiringthemtocoverthe1,000,000 binder, requiring them to cover the 800,000 loss.
Under agency law, the principal is fully liable for the acts of its agent when the agent acts within the scope of apparent authority.

Key Concept

Apparent Authority in Agency Law
Rate this question

Topics

Producer Authority and Agency Law

More questions from this topic