An individual applying for a life insurance policy intentionally answers "no" to an application question asking if they have been diagnosed with diabetes, despite receiving a positive diagnosis two months prior. The applicant deliberately conceals this fact to avoid a higher premium. If the insurer discovers this deception, which of the following best describes the legal classification of the applicant's action and its effect on the policy?
- AIt is a breach of warranty, because every answer provided on a life insurance application is legally classified as an absolute warranty.
- BIt creates a morale hazard, meaning the insurer is still obligated to pay claims but may increase the premium retroactively.
- It is a fraudulent material misrepresentation, which provides the insurer with the legal grounds to void the contract.Answer
- DIt is an application discrepancy that the licensed producer is legally authorized to cross out and correct on the applicant's behalf.
Answer
The action is a fraudulent material misrepresentation, which provides the insurer with the legal grounds to void the insurance contract.
The applicant's deliberate action of lying about a known medical condition to obtain a lower premium constitutes fraud. Because the concealed fact is material to the underwriting decision, the insurer has the legal right to void or rescind the contract upon discovering the intentional deception.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Fraud and Material Misrepresentation