A biomedical research facility purchases a commercial property insurance policy that was drafted entirely by the insurance provider. During the first policy term, a severe storm causes $2.4 million in damage to the facility's specialized climate-controlled storage units. When the facility files a claim, the insurer denies it, presenting two legal arguments:
First, the insurer asserts that a highly ambiguous provision in the policy's exclusion section applies to climate-controlled units, thereby removing coverage.
Second, the insurer attempts to void the policy by arguing that the research facility never signed a legal guarantee committing to pay all future premiums for the remainder of the policy term, claiming this lack of a reciprocal promise invalidates the contract.
Based on the distinctive legal characteristics of insurance contracts, which of the following statements correctly evaluate the insurer's arguments? (Select all that apply)
- The ambiguity regarding the climate-controlled units will be resolved in favor of the research facility because the policy is a contract of adhesion.Answer
- The insurer's second argument is invalid because insurance policies are unilateral contracts, meaning only the insurer makes a legally enforceable promise.Answer
- CThe ambiguity in the policy exclusions must be interpreted in favor of the insurance company to enforce the strict terms of the written agreement.
- DThe lack of a guaranteed future premium commitment from the insured means the contract lacks mutual consideration and is therefore voidable.