An insured suffers severe roof damage and files a claim. The insurance company's staff adjuster inspects the property and explicitly tells the insured, "This specific damage is fully covered. You are cleared to sign a contract with a builder to begin immediate repairs." Relying on this assurance, the insured signs a binding $30,000 contract with a roofing company. Two weeks later, the insurer's home office reviews the file, realizes the policy contains a clear and strict endorsement excluding windstorm damage in that specific coastal zone, and issues a formal denial. The insured sues the insurer for the repair costs.
Which legal doctrine would a court most likely apply to compel the insurer to pay the claim despite the valid written exclusion?
- EstoppelAnswer
- BWaiver
- CContract of Adhesion
- DApparent Authority