Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumAgent Authority and Agency Law

Producer Michael is an appointed agent for Summit General Insurance. His written agency contract explicitly authorizes him to write commercial liability policies with limits up to 1,000,000.SummitGeneralprovidedMichaelwithcompanyletterhead,applicationforms,andofficialpolicybinderstofacilitatehiswork.Duringameetingwithanewclient,Michaelissuesabinderfora1,000,000. Summit General provided Michael with company letterhead, application forms, and official policy binders to facilitate his work. During a meeting with a new client, Michael issues a binder for a 2,000,000 policy on Summit General letterhead. In several previous transactions, Michael had issued $2,000,000 binders, and Summit General had consistently accepted the business and issued the policies without reprimanding him or notifying the clients of his contractual limits. Based on the principles of agent authority and agency law, which of the following statements are correct?

  1. Issuing the $2,000,000 binder is an exercise of apparent authority because Summit General's past actions created a reasonable public belief that Michael possessed this power.Answer
  2. Michael's use of the provided application forms and letterhead to conduct standard daily business activities is an exercise of implied authority.Answer
  3. C
    Summit General is legally exempt from honoring the $2,000,000 binder because Michael exceeded the limits stated in his written contract.
  4. D
    The specific contractual provision authorizing Michael to write policies up to $1,000,000 represents his apparent authority.

Answer

The correct statements are that issuing the larger binder is an exercise of apparent authority, and using the provided materials for daily business is an exercise of implied authority.
Agency law recognizes three distinct forms of authority. Implied authority empowers agents to perform necessary, unwritten tasks associated with their job, such as using provided company forms and letterhead. Apparent authority occurs when a principal's actions (such as repeatedly accepting policies that exceed an agent's contractual limit) lead a reasonable third party to believe the agent has the power to act. Because Summit General created this apparent authority, they are legally bound to the unauthorized binder.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Differentiate between the three types of agent authority.
Express authority is written, implied authority is assumed for necessary daily tasks, and apparent authority is created by the principal's actions or inaction.
Accurate application of agency law requires properly classifying the agent's actions.
2
Evaluate the use of company letterhead and forms.
Since Michael is authorized to write policies, the power to use company materials to execute those sales is assumed, making it implied authority.
Agents automatically possess the implied powers necessary to fulfill their express duties.
3
Evaluate the issuance of the $2,000,000 binder.
Although this exceeded his express authority, the insurer's history of accepting these binders without objection created the appearance that he had the authority to do so.
Apparent authority arises when a third party reasonably believes the agent has authority based on the principal's past behaviors or omissions.
4
Determine the insurer's legal liability.
Because apparent authority was established by Summit General, they are legally bound to honor the $2,000,000 binder.
Under the law of agency, a principal is responsible for the acts of its agent when acting under express, implied, or apparent authority.

Key Concept

Agent Authority and Agency Law
Rate this question

Topics

Agent Authority and Agency Law

More questions from this topic