Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardCompleting the Application

A financial advisor is processing a high-limit disability income insurance application. After the client signs the document and provides the initial premium check, the advisor returns to the agency office and notices that the specific section regarding "Other In-Force Disability Coverage" was left entirely blank. Recalling a previous verbal conversation where the client mentioned having no other policies, the advisor writes the word "None" in the blank space to prevent underwriting delays, without having the client initial the addition. The application is submitted and the policy is issued at standard rates. Eight months later, the client files a massive claim. During the investigation, the insurer discovers the client actually possessed three other significant disability policies at the time of application, resulting in severe over-insurance. Which of the following best describes the legal consequence of the advisor's method of completing this application?

  1. A
    By issuing the policy, the insurer permanently waived its right to contest the over-insurance because the original question was left unanswered by the applicant at the time of signing.
  2. The insurer's ability to deny the claim for material misrepresentation is severely compromised because the false statement was inserted by the advisor without the applicant's initials, meaning the applicant did not legally make the representation.Answer
  3. C
    The alteration is legally valid and binding on the applicant because advisors possess implied authority to correct obvious application omissions based on prior factual disclosures.
  4. D
    The insurer can automatically deny the claim because the advisor's written insertion of "None" functions as an absolute warranty that strictly guarantees the applicant's eligibility status.

Answer

The insurer's ability to deny the claim for material misrepresentation is severely compromised because the false statement was inserted by the advisor without the applicant's initials, meaning the applicant did not legally make the representation.
The correct answer accurately applies the rule that applicants must initial any changes to an application. If an agent fills in a blank without the applicant's consent or initials, the resulting statement is not legally a representation made by the applicant. Consequently, the insurer cannot easily use that false statement to void the policy for material misrepresentation against the insured.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core legal rule for modifying an insurance application.
Any changes, corrections, or additions to an application must be explicitly initialed by the applicant.
This ensures the applicant agrees to and verifies all information before it becomes part of the legal contract.
2
Analyze the advisor's specific actions in the scenario.
The advisor unilaterally wrote 'None' in a blank space after the client had already signed, and failed to obtain the client's initials for this addition.
This constitutes an unauthorized alteration of the application.
3
Determine the legal effect of the unauthorized alteration on the applicant's liability.
Because the applicant neither wrote nor initialed the false answer, the applicant did not legally make the representation to the insurer.
An applicant can only be held responsible for statements they actually made or endorsed.
4
Assess the impact on the insurer's ability to deny the subsequent claim.
To deny a claim for material misrepresentation, the insurer must prove the applicant lied or concealed facts. The advisor's unauthorized action destroys the insurer's primary defense.
The insurer cannot penalize the applicant for a fraudulent statement manufactured by the agent.

Key Concept

Signatures and Unauthorized Application Changes
Rate this question

Topics

Completing the Application

More questions from this topic