Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumFraud and False Statements (18 U.S.C. 1033 and 1034)

During an internal audit, the executive management of a multi-state insurance carrier discovers that one of their top-performing underwriters was convicted of a felony involving a breach of trust six years ago. The underwriter never obtained written consent from any insurance regulator to work in the industry. Despite knowing this fact, the executive team decides to keep the underwriter employed due to their high performance. Under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1033, what are the legal consequences for the executives who made this decision?

  1. They may face federal criminal penalties for willfully permitting a prohibited individual to participate in the business of insurance.Answer
  2. B
    They are protected from liability through the doctrine of estoppel since the underwriter had already been performing their duties successfully.
  3. C
    They face no federal liability, but the state's Guaranty Association will impose a surcharge on the carrier's future premiums.
  4. D
    They are exempt from federal penalties as long as they issue a company-level waiver authorizing the underwriter's continued employment.

Answer

The executives may face federal criminal penalties for willfully permitting a prohibited individual to participate in the business of insurance.
Under 18 U.S.C. 1033, it is a federal criminal offense not only for a prohibited person (someone convicted of a felony involving dishonesty or breach of trust) to engage in the business of insurance without written consent, but also for any person to willfully permit such an individual to participate in the business. By knowingly retaining the underwriter, the executives are directly violating federal law and face criminal penalties themselves.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the relevant federal statute.
18 U.S.C. 1033 governs fraud, false statements, and the employment of individuals convicted of specific felonies within the insurance industry.
This establishes the legal framework for the scenario.
2
Evaluate the employee's legal status.
The underwriter has a felony conviction for a breach of trust and lacks written regulatory consent, classifying them as a prohibited person.
This determines if the 1033(e) waiver requirement applies to the individual.
3
Analyze the employer's actions and knowledge.
The executive team knowingly (willfully) allowed the prohibited person to remain employed after discovering the conviction.
Employer liability under the statute hinges on whether the permission was willful.
4
Determine the statutory consequence.
Willfully permitting a prohibited person to participate in the business of insurance is a direct violation of federal law, subject to criminal penalties.
This applies the specific provision of 18 U.S.C. 1033 to the executives' decision.

Key Concept

Employer Criminal Liability under 18 U.S.C. 1033
Rate this question

Topics

Fraud and False Statements (18 U.S.C. 1033 and 1034)

More questions from this topic