Question

Difficulty: Very hardLaw of Large Numbers

Match each actuarial scenario regarding risk pooling to the correct outcome or principle associated with the Law of Large Numbers.

  • Aggregating 250,000 independent, identical worker's compensation exposures within a single occupational risk classification.Maximizes statistical credibility, allowing for highly stable premium calculations due to minimized variance in expected aggregate losses.
  • Consolidating 10,000 high-severity aviation liability policies with 90,000 low-severity personal umbrella policies to artificially inflate the total exposure count.Violates the prerequisite of homogeneous exposure units, rendering aggregate loss predictions statistically invalid despite the large total pool size.
  • Pricing a novel commercial cyber liability product based exclusively on the historical loss data of 150 early-adopter technology firms.Subjects the insurer's rate-setting to excessive volatility and statistical noise, as the limited exposure base fails to trigger actuarial credibility.
  • Achieving a 1% margin of error in projecting total annual mortality costs for a mega-group plan, while remaining unable to identify specific decedents.Validates the core premise that macroscopic pool predictability does not eliminate microscopic uncertainty for individual insureds.

Answer

The correct alignments are: 1. Identical worker's comp exposures maximize statistical credibility. 2. Mixing aviation and umbrella policies violates the prerequisite of homogeneous exposure units. 3. 150 cyber policies subjects the insurer to excessive volatility and statistical noise. 4. Projecting total mortality without identifying decedents validates macroscopic predictability without microscopic certainty.
The correct alignments thoroughly demonstrate the operational boundaries of the Law of Large Numbers. It requires a high volume of independent, homogeneous (similar) exposure units to accurately predict aggregate future losses and minimize variance. Aggregating identical exposures perfectly maximizes this statistical credibility. However, mixing heterogeneous risks like aviation and personal umbrella policies strictly violates the homogeneity requirement, rendering predictions statistically invalid regardless of the large total count. Small sample sizes fail to provide credible data, leading to severe rate volatility. Finally, the principle accurately predicts a group's total losses while mathematically unable to pinpoint which specific individuals will suffer those losses.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate the first scenario regarding identical exposures.
Matches with maximized statistical credibility.
A high volume of homogeneous, independent units directly satisfies the requirements of the Law of Large Numbers, reducing variance and increasing credibility.
2
Evaluate the consolidation of aviation and umbrella policies.
Matches with violating the prerequisite of homogeneous exposure units.
Even though the combined pool is large (100,000), the risks are vastly different in severity and nature, breaking the fundamental rule of homogeneity required for accurate pooling.
3
Evaluate pricing based on 150 tech firms.
Matches with excessive volatility and statistical noise.
The sample size is far too small for the Law of Large Numbers to operate effectively, preventing the actuary from making reliable predictions.
4
Evaluate projecting total mortality without knowing specific decedents.
Matches with macroscopic pool predictability versus microscopic uncertainty.
The Law of Large Numbers only predicts aggregate losses for the pool, never predicting which specific individual will incur the loss.

Key Concept

The Law of Large Numbers requires a substantial volume of homogeneous (similar) and independent exposure units to accurately predict future aggregate losses, while remaining unable to predict individual risk occurrences.
Rate this question