An insurance company issues a standard health policy to an applicant. A few months later, a medical claim is filed, but a disagreement arises over a specific coverage exclusion. Upon review, the legal language used in the exclusion is found to be vague and open to multiple interpretations. Based on the legal principles governing insurance contracts, which of the following describes how this ambiguity will be resolved?
- The ambiguous language will be construed strictly against the insurer and in favor of the policyholder.Answer
- BThe language will be interpreted in favor of the insurer to uphold the original intent of the underwriter.
- CThe vague wording will be treated as a breach of warranty by the applicant, rendering the policy void.
- DThe policyholder will be deemed to have voluntarily waived their coverage rights by signing the unclear document.
Answer
The ambiguous language will be construed strictly against the insurer and in favor of the policyholder.
Because insurance policies are contracts of adhesion (drafted entirely by the insurer on a take-it-or-leave-it basis), the policyholder has no ability to negotiate the specific wording. Under established legal interpretation rules, if the insurer uses vague or ambiguous language, courts will resolve the ambiguity strictly against the insurer and in favor of the policyholder.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Contracts of Adhesion and Ambiguity
Estimated Time:45s