Question

Difficulty: Very hardMethods of Handling Risk

Horizon Aerospace Manufacturing is evaluating its exposure to liability claims stemming from its testing of experimental jet propellants. The company's risk management committee implements the following four directives:

1. The development of solid-state propellants is completely halted due to the unquantifiable risk of spontaneous combustion.
2. For liquid propellants, the facility installs automated chemical suppression systems and reinforced blast walls.
3. The company establishes a funded captive subsidiary to strictly cover the first $5 million of any resulting liability claim.
4. All third-party testing contractors are required to sign hold-harmless agreements naming Horizon as an indemnified party.

Based on the STARR framework of risk management, which of the following statements correctly classify the risk handling methods utilized by Horizon Aerospace? (Select all that apply)

  1. Establishing the funded captive subsidiary to cover the first $5 million of liability claims represents an active form of risk retention.Answer
  2. Requiring third-party contractors to sign hold-harmless agreements represents a non-insurance method of risk transfer.Answer
  3. C
    Installing the automated chemical suppression systems and reinforced blast walls represents risk avoidance, as it neutralizes the hazard of a catastrophic explosion.
  4. D
    Halting the development of solid-state propellants represents risk reduction, because it decreases the frequency of potential liability claims across the company's entire product line.

Answer

Establishing a captive subsidiary constitutes active risk retention, and utilizing hold-harmless agreements constitutes non-insurance risk transfer.
The correct options accurately identify that setting aside internal funds via a captive subsidiary is a deliberate method of absorbing liability (active risk retention), and that utilizing hold-harmless agreements shifts the legal burden of the risk to an outside party, which is a textbook example of non-insurance risk transfer.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the action of halting solid-state propellant development.
This completely eliminates the specific exposure.
Eliminating an exposure by refusing to engage in the activity is defined as risk avoidance, not risk reduction.
2
Analyze the installation of suppression systems and blast walls.
This lessens the severity of a potential loss while allowing the liquid propellant testing to continue.
Taking steps to mitigate the impact of a hazard without eliminating the core activity is defined as risk reduction.
3
Analyze the creation of a funded captive subsidiary for the $5 million tier.
The company is deliberately absorbing and funding its own potential losses up to a specified limit.
Assuming the financial responsibility for a loss (often through self-insurance or deductibles) is defined as risk retention.
4
Analyze the requirement for contractors to sign hold-harmless agreements.
The financial and legal burden of the risk is shifted from Horizon Aerospace to the third-party contractors.
Shifting the burden of a loss to another entity, either through insurance contracts or legal agreements, is defined as risk transfer.

Key Concept

Methods of Handling Risk (STARR)
Rate this question