Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardSources of Underwriting Information

During the underwriting process for a life insurance policy, an applicant answers "No" to having a history of diabetes on Part II of the application. The Agent's Report notes that the applicant frequently engages in extremely careless behavior, such as reckless, uninsured rock climbing. The underwriter subsequently orders a Medical Information Bureau (MIB) report, which reveals a code indicating previous treatment for diabetes. Acting on this information, the underwriter takes four distinct actions:

1. Declares the applicant's false statement about diabetes to be a breach of warranty.
2. Unilaterally changes the application answer from "No" to "Yes" to reflect the MIB findings.
3. Classifies the applicant's reckless rock climbing as a physical hazard.
4. Issues an immediate policy decline based solely on the MIB report's code.

Based on the rules governing sources of underwriting information and risk principles, which of the following accurately evaluates the underwriter's actions?

  1. A
    The underwriter was permitted to unilaterally amend the application to ensure accurate records, but erred because an MIB report cannot be the sole basis for a decline, and carelessness should be classified as a morale hazard.
  2. B
    The underwriter correctly identified the false medical statement as a breached warranty that voids the contract, but violated procedures by altering the application without consent and by using the MIB report as the sole justification for denial.
  3. The underwriter acted incorrectly in all four instances, as application statements are representations, alterations require the applicant's consent, carelessness constitutes a morale hazard, and an MIB report cannot be the sole basis for an adverse decision.Answer
  4. D
    The underwriter accurately classified the applicant's extreme carelessness as a physical hazard, but violated underwriting rules by altering the application without consent and by declining the policy without corroborating the MIB data with an Attending Physician's Statement (APS).

Answer

The underwriter acted incorrectly in all four instances, as application statements are representations, alterations require the applicant's consent, carelessness constitutes a morale hazard, and an MIB report cannot be the sole basis for an adverse decision.
The correct answer accurately identifies that the underwriter made four distinct errors. First, statements made by the applicant on an insurance application are considered representations, not warranties. Second, any changes or modifications to an application must be initialed by the applicant; an underwriter cannot unilaterally alter it. Third, a hazard arising from carelessness or a reckless attitude is defined as a morale hazard, whereas a physical hazard relates to tangible conditions. Finally, MIB rules explicitly prohibit an insurer from using an MIB report as the sole basis for declining an applicant without further verification, such as an Attending Physician's Statement (APS).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the underwriter's classification of the applicant's statement.
The underwriter treated the false statement as a warranty. However, statements on life insurance applications are legally representations.
Understanding the legal difference between warranties and representations is required to assess contract validity.
2
Evaluate the unilateral change made to the application.
The underwriter unilaterally changed the 'No' to a 'Yes'. This is a procedural violation, as all changes must be initialed by the applicant.
Regulatory procedures mandate applicant consent for application modifications to prevent fraud and ensure agreement.
3
Assess the categorization of the applicant's rock climbing.
The underwriter called the reckless behavior a physical hazard. It is actually a morale hazard, which arises from a state of mind or carelessness.
Accurate risk classification requires distinguishing between physical, moral, and morale hazards.
4
Determine the validity of the policy decline based on the MIB report.
The underwriter declined the policy solely based on the MIB code. MIB rules strictly prohibit using their reports as the sole basis for an adverse underwriting decision.
Compliance with MIB guidelines requires insurers to conduct further independent investigation (like ordering an APS) before taking adverse action.

Key Concept

Sources of Underwriting Information and Risk Principles
Rate this question

Topics

Sources of Underwriting Information

More questions from this topic